-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Boto3 UTC DeprecationWarnings #3889
Comments
Hi @BookWorm0 thanks for reaching out. The team is aware of this issue and working on addressing the warnings. These deprecations won't cause impact currently beyond the warnings. The required changes are not fully backwards compatible for existing usage. We'll be prioritizing a more robust fix in an upcoming release. |
@tim-finnigan Thank you very much! |
Any update on this as the warnings break my CI/CD flow unless I turn off error::DeprecationWarning which I really don't want to |
Add pytest decorator to affected tests, if you use pytest |
Hello @tim-finnigan, any updates on this? |
Any updates on this? |
We have two warnings on the repo at the moment, both from dependencies (so outside of our control). One is from botocore (boto/boto3#3889) and the other is from sqlalchemy. Both are Python 3.12 DeprecationWarnings about datetime.datetime.utcnow and datetime.datetime.utcfromtimestamp being scheduled for removal in future python versions.
Do you happen to have any updates on this? |
Any update regarding this, I am using Django and recently updated my python version from 3.9 to 3.12, and I simply can't ignore the warnings in multiple Django apps, as there are so many places using botocore. |
It needs this PR on botocore to be merged in and released |
So why they are not merging it? how can I use that PR in my project?
|
Any updates on this? |
Thanks all for your patience. The team is continuing to track this in the backlog — please feel free to 👍 the issue to +1 it. As mentioned in a related PR:
|
Does boto/botocore#3239 address this problem in a way that avoids the "breaking date serialization" problem? If not, please leave feedback on that PR that points out the specific way that the date serialization breaks (and -- ideally -- a test case that I can use to ensure that PR addresses the problem). Thanks! |
@tim-finnigan Any updates on this? This is burning through our log quota. Any alternatives other than filter warnings? |
@tim-finnigan can you please help out and fix this? It's been going on for too long now.. |
@tim-finnigan Please review boto/botocore#3239, which I anticipate avoids the "breaking date serialization" problem. If not, please point out the specific way that the date serialization breaks so that I can update the PR. Thanks, and happy holidays! |
Describe the bug
Running the attached script under Python 3.12 with Python flag -Wa produces DepricationWarnings.
bug.txt
Expected Behavior
No warnings should be issued.
Current Behavior
For "import boto3", the warning is: dateutil\tz\tz.py:37: DeprecationWarning: datetime.datetime.utcfromtimestamp() is deprecated and scheduled for removal in a future version. Use timezone-aware objects to represent datetimes in UTC: datetime.datetime.fromtimestamp(timestamp, datetime.UTC).
EPOCH = datetime.datetime.utcfromtimestamp(0)
For s3client.list_objects, the warning is: botocore\auth.py:419: DeprecationWarning: datetime.datetime.utcnow() is deprecated and scheduled for removal in a future version. Use timezone-aware objects to represent datetimes in UTC: datetime.datetime.now(datetime.UTC).
datetime_now = datetime.datetime.utcnow()
Reproduction Steps
Rename the script from bug.txt to bug.py.
Run the script as follows from CMD.EXE:
py -Wa bug.py BUCKETNAME
where BUCKETNAME identifies an S3 bucket to which you are authorized to access.
Possible Solution
Boto source code should be modified as suggested in the warnings.
Additional Information/Context
No response
SDK version used
boto3-1.28.61 botocore-1.31.61
Environment details (OS name and version, etc.)
Windows 10 Pro Version 10.0.19045 Build 19045; Python 3.12.0
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: