Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Standardise and add documentation for creating new StandardDetector implementations #281

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
May 3, 2024

Conversation

DiamondJoseph
Copy link
Contributor

@DiamondJoseph DiamondJoseph commented May 2, 2024

Closes #263

Removes handling of ConfigSignals from the constructor of StandardDetector implementations, to be revisited when #282 can be tackled (probably after #213)

@DiamondJoseph DiamondJoseph marked this pull request as ready for review May 2, 2024 14:55
docs/how-to/make-a-standard-detector.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/how-to/make-a-standard-detector.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/examples/foo_detector.py Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/examples/foo_detector.py Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/examples/foo_detector.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
tests/epics/areadetector/test_aravis.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@DiamondJoseph DiamondJoseph merged commit 4ee3f29 into main May 3, 2024
18 checks passed
@DiamondJoseph DiamondJoseph deleted the intiPattern branch May 3, 2024 13:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

FooDetector should have a consistent initialiser pattern.
3 participants