Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

type (interface) for schnorrSig and maybe for hash/taggedHash #78

Open
msgilligan opened this issue Aug 20, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

type (interface) for schnorrSig and maybe for hash/taggedHash #78

msgilligan opened this issue Aug 20, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@msgilligan
Copy link
Member

It would be nice to have stronger types for these values, rather than using byte[]. Not only will this make a safer API, but will also
allow us to add helpful .toString() methods.

@msgilligan
Copy link
Member Author

PR #85 takes some steps in his direction, but needs more work.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant