Update 'px' units to relative sizes and use 'rem' for font-sizes

[coderabbitai]

As discussed in PR #317, we need to check where we are using 'px' and update them to use relative sizes with TailwindCSS classes. We should always use 'rem' on font-sizes.

Requested by @AndlerRL.

Reference comment: #317 (comment)

[AndlerRL]

@coderabbitai can you run an analysis to check where we are using PX values?

[coderabbitai]

Tip

For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes.

@AndlerRL, I've analyzed the codebase for pixel (px) values. Here's a summary of where they are being used:

1. Layout Dimensions and Spacing:

• Fixed widths: w-[300px], w-[240px], w-[180px], etc.
• Fixed heights: h-[240px], min-h-[80px], etc.
• Fixed margins/padding: px-[8px], py-[20px], etc.

2. Font Sizes:

• Direct pixel values: text-[24px], text-[16px], text-[11px], etc.

3. Border Properties:

• Border widths: border-[3px], border-[2px], etc.
• Border radius: rounded-[8px], rounded-[6px], etc.

4. Email Templates:

• Various inline styles with pixel values for margins, padding, and font sizes

5. Responsive Breakpoints:

• In tailwind.config.js: '2xl': '1400px'

Recommendations:

1. Font Sizes: Replace all text-[Xpx] with Tailwind's relative size classes:

   - text-[24px]
   + text-2xl

2. Spacing: Use Tailwind's relative spacing scale:

   - px-[8px]
   + px-2

3. Component Dimensions: Use relative units or viewport units:

   - w-[300px]
   + w-72 // or w-[18rem]

4. Border Properties: Use Tailwind's default classes:

   - border-[3px]
   + border-[0.1875rem]

5. Email Templates: Consider using rem units for better accessibility:

   - margin-bottom: 20px
   + margin-bottom: 1.25rem

Would you like me to create a GitHub issue to track these changes? We can break them down into smaller, manageable tasks.

🐰 thoughtfully analyzing the pixel values in your codebase

🔗 Analysis chain

I'll help you analyze where PX values are being used in the codebase. Let me search for these occurrences.

---

Let me modify the search to use more basic file extensions since some file types aren't recognized.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for px values in CSS/SCSS/Style files and JSX/TSX files
echo "Files containing 'px' values:"
rg -l '\b\d+px\b' --type=css --type=scss --type=jsx --type=tsx

echo -e "\nDetailed matches with context:"
rg -C 2 '\b\d+px\b' --type=css --type=scss --type=jsx --type=tsx

# Also check for inline styles in JS/TS files that might use px
echo -e "\nInline styles with px values:"
rg -C 2 'style=.*\b\d+px\b' --type=js --type=ts --type=jsx --type=tsx

# Check for styled-components or other CSS-in-JS patterns
echo -e "\nCSS-in-JS patterns with px:"
rg -C 2 '`.*\b\d+px\b.*`' --type=js --type=ts --type=jsx --type=tsx

Length of output: 685

---

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for px values in all relevant file types
echo "Files containing 'px' values:"
rg -l '\b\d+px\b' -g '*.css' -g '*.scss' -g '*.js' -g '*.jsx' -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx'

echo -e "\nDetailed matches with context:"
rg -C 2 '\b\d+px\b' -g '*.css' -g '*.scss' -g '*.js' -g '*.jsx' -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx'

# Also check for inline styles with px values
echo -e "\nInline styles with px values:"
rg -C 2 'style=.*\b\d+px\b' -g '*.js' -g '*.jsx' -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx'

# Check for styled-components or other CSS-in-JS patterns
echo -e "\nCSS-in-JS patterns with px:"
rg -C 2 '`.*\b\d+px\b.*`' -g '*.js' -g '*.jsx' -g '*.ts' -g '*.tsx'

Length of output: 98720