-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 72
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Prediction Qualifiers #1494
Comments
Hi @riyavsinha - nice to hear from you! Thank you for the question. Yes, we just released Biolink 4.2.0 with some guidance in adding two edge properties, Details and guidance for assigning ‘At-a-Glance’ provenance properties that allow users to make a first-pass assessment of the strength, relevance, and utility of a given Edge or Result. Enumerated values for
and for ‘knowledge_level’ (which describes the level or type of statement that is reported in an edge, based on the reasoning or analysis methods used to generate the knowledge it reports, or the type/strength of evidence supporting this knowledge), enumerated values include:
The main challenge in applying this standard concerns selecting appropriate agent type and knowledge level terms for a given edge. Separation of agent type and knowledge level into separate properties is intended to make it easier to identify and apply the most appropriate terms for each of these provenance characteristics. https://biolink.github.io/biolink-model/agent_type/ Some additional guidance:
With regards to specifying a specific kind of model in the edge metadata as well; if you would like to provide a list of methods, we can better help sort out which additional biolink property best holds those? |
Thank you for the detailed response, that is really helpful to know, and great that BioLink supports that!
For this, we haven't established a set list of methods yet, but in general, could be things like Enformer, AlphaMissense, Activity-by-Contact (ABC) models, ChromBPNet models, etc. It seems like the |
Question:
We are looking to include predictive associations in a knowledge graph using the BioLink model. Are there currently qualifiers to specify
is_predicted
with a boolean value and/orpredicted_by_model_type
with some model (e.g. Enformer, AlphaMissense) or is there a recommended way to do so?If not, is this within the scope of BioLink and something we can work to add, or would it be recommended to extend it independently?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: