You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The contents of the UNF file can be perceived as a "molecular scene" in a sense. For example, it may contain a lattice-based DNA structure, combined with coarse-grained protein and a fully atomistic molecule. Thus, the UNF file may contain a multi-component structure (spanning also different abstraction levels) consisting of structures created by various authors.
Example: Imagine a PDB structure converted to UNF using the PDB->UNF converter. Then, edit this UNF file by adding a multilayer DNA origami lattice. The file now contains two structures/components created by different authors.
Right now, the root-level fields name and author refer (according to their description) to a structure name and author, respectively.
However, due to the aforementioned reasons, these fields should probably refer to the file name/author – their semantic meaning should be therefore changed. Moreover, author field (and potentially also DOI ?) should be probably added also to the lattices and structures. This way, more fine-grained distinction of individual parts of the UNF file will be enabled.
I am considering including this feature in one of the upcoming releases.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The contents of the UNF file can be perceived as a "molecular scene" in a sense. For example, it may contain a lattice-based DNA structure, combined with coarse-grained protein and a fully atomistic molecule. Thus, the UNF file may contain a multi-component structure (spanning also different abstraction levels) consisting of structures created by various authors.
Example: Imagine a PDB structure converted to UNF using the PDB->UNF converter. Then, edit this UNF file by adding a multilayer DNA origami lattice. The file now contains two structures/components created by different authors.
Right now, the root-level fields name and author refer (according to their description) to a structure name and author, respectively.
However, due to the aforementioned reasons, these fields should probably refer to the file name/author – their semantic meaning should be therefore changed. Moreover, author field (and potentially also DOI ?) should be probably added also to the lattices and structures. This way, more fine-grained distinction of individual parts of the UNF file will be enabled.
I am considering including this feature in one of the upcoming releases.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: