You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There might be some relevant missing artifacts from the latest deployments.
In general, by default we create one artifact that matches the build info name. But for pool deployments, there should be at least a pool + factory artifact (optionally with rebalancer or other auxiliary contracts).
Related with #1503; this could be standarized with the deployment.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
What we should do ultimately depends on who is using the artifact files and for what purpose. It looked like the deployment tasks always used the build-info, but the artifacts are used in unit tests (e.g., to extract abi, bytecode, etc.)
The artifacts are what is published by npm: we can't publish the entire build info as that'd be too much data (and the package should be somewhat lightweight). The artifacts should contain abi + creation code.
There might be some relevant missing artifacts from the latest deployments.
In general, by default we create one artifact that matches the build info name. But for pool deployments, there should be at least a pool + factory artifact (optionally with rebalancer or other auxiliary contracts).
Related with #1503; this could be standarized with the deployment.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: