Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Was it so that you should extend the accepted geometries for sprint 2_3? #151

Open
JanErikHoel opened this issue Jun 12, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@JanErikHoel
Copy link
Contributor

My pull request for sprint 2_3 was OK now, except for the geometries.

I use ifcTriangulatedFaceSet, but you require ifcTriangulatedIrregularNetwork

Was it so that you should add this well to the accepted geometry representations in the checker?

@SergejMuhic
Copy link
Collaborator

For infrastructure software we recommend using IfcTriangulatedIrregularNetwork for surface representations related to terrain and surface of infrastructure objects. If edge information is not of interest, just use the value '0' (no breaklines) for Flags

For body representations, IfcTriangulatedFaceSet is recommended.

The above two points are what the checker reflects.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants