-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
q5_findings.txt
24 lines (17 loc) · 4.71 KB
/
q5_findings.txt
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Key Findings
1. RNA Count (`nCount_RNA`):
- Mean RNA Count: Younger subjects (e.g., age 57) have a lower mean RNA count compared to subjects in their early 60s. For instance, the mean `nCount_RNA` at age 57 is approximately 1929, increasing to around 3470 by age 61. This trend suggests an initial rise in RNA production in the early 60s.
- Decline with Age: Beyond age 65, the RNA count gradually declines in older subjects. By age 80, the mean RNA count decreases significantly. This decrease could indicate age-related transcriptional repression, where the cells of older subjects reduce RNA production as part of cellular aging.
2. RNA Feature Count (`nFeature_RNA`):
- Feature Diversity: Younger age groups (around 57–62) show greater diversity in RNA features, with the mean `nFeature_RNA` at age 57 around 1090. This diversity peaks around age 61 with an increase in both mean and upper percentiles, reaching a mean of approximately 1502 at age 62.
- Decreasing Range in Older Ages: In subjects aged 80 and older, the diversity in RNA features decreases sharply. The 75th percentile also shows a reduction, suggesting that as subjects age, the range of expressed features narrows, potentially limiting the cell's adaptability and functionality.
3. Exon Count (`nCount_Exon`):
- Increased Exon Counts in Middle Age: Exon counts peak around age 61, with the mean `nCount_Exon` reaching roughly 2392. This could correspond to a period of heightened gene expression activity, possibly linked to the body’s adaptation to early aging.
- Decline in Older Subjects: By age 80, both the mean and upper ranges of exon counts diminish, reflecting reduced exonic transcriptional activity in older subjects. This trend could imply a decreased ability to produce the necessary protein-coding RNA, which might impact cell maintenance and repair.
4. Exon Feature Diversity (`nFeature_Exon`):
- Higher Diversity in Younger Subjects: Similar to RNA features, exon feature diversity is greater in younger subjects. For instance, at age 57, the mean `nFeature_Exon` is around 617, indicating a wide range of exonic transcripts.
- Reduction in Older Age Groups: By age 80, the diversity in exon features reduces considerably, with the mean dropping and the maximum values also decreasing. This reduction in diversity suggests a narrowed transcriptome, which could contribute to age-related cellular decline by limiting the variety of proteins the cell can produce.
Insights
These findings indicate that younger subjects have higher RNA and exon counts overall, with more variety in features associated with RNA and exons. This diverse transcriptome depicts cells in a flexible cellular state, which is highly adaptable and might provide an effective way to respond to the broad physiological requirements. The range of expressed genes and exonic elements perhaps offers a more robust cellular environment in younger subjects, consistent with processes such as tissue repair, immune response, and adaptation to metabolic changes. "Cellular adaptability" is suggested herein to be highly important for the maintenance of health or the response to environmental or internal stresses.
In contrast, levels of RNA and exon are far lower in elderly subjects aged 80 years and above, reflecting lower diversity of RNA and exon features. It is likely that such narrowing of the transcriptome in older subjects reflects aging-related changes at the cellular level, which include decreased transcriptional activity and poor adaptability in gene expression. As a result, less diversity in gene expression would render the cell less competent in dealing with stress, damage repair, or simply functioning optimally-all important components of healthy aging. These limitations can also foster vulnerability to age-related diseases because decreased cellular capacity slows down the rate at which cells are able to replace or repair key proteins and respond to cellular damage.
These age-related differences might indicate that cellular aging is characterized by a decline in the complexity and abundance of gene expression. This eventually leads to loss of cellular function and the increased vulnerability observed in many aging-related diseases, including neurodegeneration and cardiovascular problems. Understanding these age-dependent changes in gene expression may be important for identifying selective genes or pathways which become dysregulated with time. In the future, research may focus on determining what genes are primarily affected with aging and check if specialized therapies can retain the variability in gene expression that provides cellular resilience. This way, one may be able to preserve cellular function during aging and achieve good health span by delaying the onslaught of age-related diseases.