You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The KMS PQ integration test started failing because an unexpected KEM group was being negotiated. See #5082. It appears that some KMS hosts have been updated with a new security policy that supports ML-KEM, and the resulting kyber KEM group preference changed as a result of that.
Ideally we would update the integration test to negotiate ML-KEM and assert that ML-KEM was negotiated, but this was flaky when I tried it. I think some of the KMS hosts still only support the draft KEM groups. For now, the test just asserts that any KEM group was negotiated.
Solution:
After ML-KEM is fully supported, we should update the test to assert that ML-KEM was specifically negotiated.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Problem:
The KMS PQ integration test started failing because an unexpected KEM group was being negotiated. See #5082. It appears that some KMS hosts have been updated with a new security policy that supports ML-KEM, and the resulting kyber KEM group preference changed as a result of that.
Ideally we would update the integration test to negotiate ML-KEM and assert that ML-KEM was negotiated, but this was flaky when I tried it. I think some of the KMS hosts still only support the draft KEM groups. For now, the test just asserts that any KEM group was negotiated.
Solution:
After ML-KEM is fully supported, we should update the test to assert that ML-KEM was specifically negotiated.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: