Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Vendor contact form improvement suggestion #221

Open
arraypress opened this issue May 26, 2017 · 5 comments
Open

Vendor contact form improvement suggestion #221

arraypress opened this issue May 26, 2017 · 5 comments

Comments

@arraypress
Copy link

I agree a modal box is a bad idea, however I have a better suggestion for the vendor contact form to position it better within the vendor page so it's not just dumped at the bottom of the page.

My idea was to use tabs, which would allow for the contact form to be hidden initially until clicked. Here is a screenshot of my rough implementation (still reworking the look of it).

The tabbed approach would have a few advantages such as allowing additional tabs for a larger about page, vendor public wishlists/collections, etc. Just an idea that might be worth considering!

screenshot 2017-05-26 12 22 42

@SeanTOSCD
Copy link
Contributor

@davidsherlock full custom or are you using a library to implement a tabbed interface? Requires a page load or switches tabs in place?

@arraypress
Copy link
Author

arraypress commented May 26, 2017 via email

@SeanTOSCD
Copy link
Contributor

I agree totally. I experimented with a few other layouts but ultimately chose to put it at the bottom. I might revisit again eventually. It's not high priority at the moment.

@spencerfinnell
Copy link

If tabs are implemented you should make sure they can be linked to directly and the relevant content is shown.

@SeanTOSCD
Copy link
Contributor

@spencerfinnell no doubt about it. Learned that lesson on EDD site's account page.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants