Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Question] Why do we need a tf if ask & tell would not need it? #1110

Open
TheEimer opened this issue May 29, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

[Question] Why do we need a tf if ask & tell would not need it? #1110

TheEimer opened this issue May 29, 2024 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@TheEimer
Copy link

When instantiating SMAC only for the purpose of using the ask & tell interface, I still either need to write a wrapper for my target function or just give SMAC a dummy function, both of which is not exactly elegant. I assume the reasoning here is that when users actually provide a runnable tf, they can continue with the standard execution in addition to ask & tell. I bet this is not the most common usage of ask & tell, though, and likely super confusing to new users. How about relaxing that constraint by simply issuing a warning? Something like "Instantiating SMAC with out tae runner - this means you will only be able to use the ask & tell interface."?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants