You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
That being said, the recommended library doesn't have much GitHub activity and appears to just be a fork of python-jose that changed the vulnerable pycrypto dependency for pycryptodome, but (a) hasn't kept up with python-jose, (b) is now redundant since python-jose has just switched to pycryptodome too (mpdavis/python-jose@98406bc).
For python's quickstart, the docs say to use
python-jose-cryptodome
rather thanpython-jose
(https://auth0.com/docs/quickstart/backend/python#install-the-dependencies).That being said, the recommended library doesn't have much GitHub activity and appears to just be a fork of
python-jose
that changed the vulnerable pycrypto dependency for pycryptodome, but (a) hasn't kept up withpython-jose
, (b) is now redundant sincepython-jose
has just switched to pycryptodome too (mpdavis/python-jose@98406bc).However looking at https://jwt.io/#libraries-io there appears to be yet another JWT option that's much more popular/active than
python-jose
:https://github.com/jpadilla/pyjwt/
As such, would it be possible to make a change to the recommended library. Which of
python-jose
andPyJWT
would be best for long term reliability?Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: