Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ability to run component state checks upon app resume #1032

Closed
XavierChanth opened this issue May 12, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

Ability to run component state checks upon app resume #1032

XavierChanth opened this issue May 12, 2023 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@XavierChanth
Copy link
Member

XavierChanth commented May 12, 2023

Describe the bug

An issue occurred where monitor died in an emulator instance of an app, and monitor did not restart itself.

So far, the issue is not reproducible in a pure dart environment.

Expected behavior

A potential solution in at_client_mobile would be to listen for the app resume and force a check to see if monitor needs restarting. More generally, we should add a method in the AtClient interface which apps can call when they resume from background, to ensure that various things are in the right state - e.g. connections to the atServer including the monitor connection

See also #1036

@XavierChanth XavierChanth added the bug Something isn't working label May 12, 2023
@gkc gkc changed the title Check if monitor restarts upon app relaunch Run component state checks upon app relaunch May 16, 2023
@gkc gkc changed the title Run component state checks upon app relaunch Run component state checks upon app resume May 16, 2023
@gkc gkc added enhancement New feature or request and removed bug Something isn't working labels May 16, 2023
@gkc gkc changed the title Run component state checks upon app resume Ability to run component state checks upon app resume May 16, 2023
@ksanty ksanty closed this as completed Oct 31, 2023
@gkc
Copy link
Contributor

gkc commented Nov 2, 2023

@XavierChanth @ksanty was this discussed (e.g. at an architecture call) and was it agreed it should be closed?

@XavierChanth
Copy link
Member Author

We discussed at sprint planning, and I said we could close it since we still have #1036 to capture the work

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants