You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
NPM has a standard way of configuring the scoped package's access level and deployment registry.
This is done using the publishConfig key in the package.json, as per the docs.
However, instead of using the publishConfig, lerna-semantic-releaserelies on the config key instead. This means that even though the publishConfig.access property is specified, lerna-semantic-release ignores it and publishes any scoped package as private.
It would be great if lerna-semantic-release could use the same NPM standard as it would make releasing scoped packages easier.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
likewise, in lerna-semantic-release-get-last-release, rather than checking for private:true, if publishConfig.registry is set, I think it should use the local version registration.
Hi there!
NPM has a standard way of configuring the scoped package's access level and deployment registry.
This is done using the
publishConfig
key in thepackage.json
, as per the docs.However, instead of using the
publishConfig
,lerna-semantic-release
relies on theconfig
key instead. This means that even though thepublishConfig.access
property is specified,lerna-semantic-release
ignores it and publishes any scoped package as private.It would be great if
lerna-semantic-release
could use the same NPM standard as it would make releasing scoped packages easier.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: