-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 54
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
CI: Vizier results are different #642
Comments
Thanks a lot for tagging me, it wasn't in my radar! After investigation:
|
I'm surprised that this still fails. This is fixed in the cds registry (see for example the entry that is tested in the docs https://cds.unistra.fr/registry/?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=ivo_vor&identifier=ivo://cds.vizier/J/ApJ/727/14) but I don't know when this will trickle down to the gavo registry of registries, which harvests these pages. |
On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 07:53:34AM -0800, Manon Marchand wrote:
I'm surprised that this still fails. This is fixed in the cds
registry (see for example the entry that is tested in the docs
https://cds.unistra.fr/registry/?verb=GetRecord&metadataPrefix=ivo_vor&identifier=ivo://cds.vizier/J/ApJ/727/14)
but I don't know when this will trickle down to the gavo registry,
which harvests these pages.
For the benefit of others who may run into similar riddles: Full VO
registries generally harvest incrementally, i.e., they go to the
publishing registries and request only records that have changed
since their last visit. They typically do full re-harvests every
year or so because incremental harvesting isn't the most robust
thing, but if you want your changes to propagate earlier than that,
you need to tell your OAI-PMH machinery that the records have
changed. I can't tell you how to do that on VizieR; if your
publishing registry is run by DaCHS, it would be a call to dachs pub.
For ivo://CDS.VizieR/J/ApJ/727/14, this date tickling apparently has
not happened. At least I'm seeing an OAI datestamp of
2022-10-24T00:00:00Z, and that's what reg.g-vo.org has; hence, it
won't propagate.
Could you make sure that the datestamp becomes something like now or
at least pretty close? Incidentally, you don't have to wait for
any trickling; you can ask the Heidelberg RegTAP service (which is
what mostly serves reg.g-vo.org) for an immediate (incremental)
re-harvest using the harvest trigger service:
http://dc.g-vo.org/rr/q/harvtrig/form
Just paste in your Registry's ivoid (I won't promise that I'm folding
case, so just use ivo://cds.vizier/registry).
|
Thank you for the explanation! |
The remote data tests fail as the results from multiple vizier queries have changed. While some of this seems OK, others are a bit puzzling, so I would instead tag @ManonMarchand to have look.
Example traceback: https://github.com/astropy/pyvo/actions/runs/12934993430/job/36077299962
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: