You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As an option to fixed boards, I would like to be able to scroll vertically on a board (like Proloquo2Go and TD Snap), and also horizontal scrolling (SonoFlex). This would allow having the same board on a large screen, a tablet and a mobile phone for those who have been using the same board and vocabulary configuration for years.
I'm not sure how many user really would need/use this. So if you're reading this and agree, please add your comment or reaction.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I am not sure, but having that option would benefit those who need to access their grid with lots of elements on a small mobile screen vs. their normally available larger device.
Yes, theoretically. However I'm not sure how many users will actually use and need it?! Most will use either one device everywhere (e.g. Tablet) or different devices where each has a quite big screen (e.g. PC and Tablet). I can't think of a specific user or use case where one would use a big 30 inch screen at home and then a small smartphone on the way.
I think the person who gave me this feedback said that it's maybe more efficient to scroll on a page than navigating through pages, however I doubt this and personally I don't have seen anyone using an AAC app with scrolling.
For instance also see this amazing example of an extremely efficient user of a talker - no scrolling, but motor planning: https://youtu.be/AFt-NT5wsDQ?t=107
User feedback:
As an option to fixed boards, I would like to be able to scroll vertically on a board (like Proloquo2Go and TD Snap), and also horizontal scrolling (SonoFlex). This would allow having the same board on a large screen, a tablet and a mobile phone for those who have been using the same board and vocabulary configuration for years.
I'm not sure how many user really would need/use this. So if you're reading this and agree, please add your comment or reaction.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: