We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
rel package coverage is very low. This is because most of the test is in the syntax package which depends on the rel package.
rel
syntax
There's a feature in go where test files can have a different package name by adding _test as a suffix. e.g. package name_test.
_test
package name_test
This would allow independent import to the rel package and in turn might allow coverage to the rel package through the tests in syntax package.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
Purpose
rel
package coverage is very low. This is because most of the test is in thesyntax
package which depends on therel
package.Suggested approaches
There's a feature in go where test files can have a different package name by adding
_test
as a suffix. e.g.package name_test
.This would allow independent import to the
rel
package and in turn might allow coverage to therel
package through the tests insyntax
package.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: