-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
Labor and Capital Are Old Leverage.html
159 lines (159 loc) · 7 KB
/
Labor and Capital Are Old Leverage.html
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
<html>
<head>
<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles2.css" />
</head>
<body>
<p>![[Naval-Ep21.mp3]]</p>
<p>Everyone is fighting over labor and capital</p>
<p>Our brains aren’t evolved to comprehend new forms of leverage</p>
<p><strong>Nivi:</strong> Why don’t we talk a little bit about leverage?</p>
<p>
The first tweet in the storm was a famous quote from Archimedes, which
was, “Give me a lever long enough and a place to stand and I will move the
Earth.”
</p>
<p>
The next tweet was, “Fortunes require leverage. Business leverage comes
from capital, people and products with no marginal costs of replication.”
</p>
<p>
<strong>Naval:</strong> Leverage is critical. The reason I stuck in
Archimedes quote in there is… normally I don’t like putting other people’s
quotes in my Twitter. That doesn’t add any value. You can go look up those
people’s quotes. But this quote I had to put in there because it’s just so
fundamental. I read it when I was very, very young and it had a huge
impression on me.
</p>
<p>
We all know what leverage is when we use a seesaw or a lever. We
understand how that works physically, but I think what our brains aren’t
really well-evolved to comprehend is how much leverage is possible in
modern society and what the newest forms of leverage are.
</p>
<p><strong>Society overvalues labor leverage</strong></p>
<p>
The oldest form of leverage is labor, which is people working for you.
Instead of me lifting rocks, I can have 10 people lift rocks. Then just by
my guidance on where the rock should go, a lot more rocks get moved than I
could do myself. Everybody understands this because we’re evolved to
understand the labor form of leverage, so what happens is society
overvalues labor as a form of leverage.
</p>
<p>
This is why your parents are impressed when you get a promotion and you
have lots of people working underneath you. This is why when a lot of
naive people, when you tell them about your company, they’ll say, “How
many people work there?” They’ll use that as a way to establish
credibility. They’re trying to measure how much leverage and impact you
actually have.
</p>
<p>
Or when someone starts a movement, they’ll say how many people they have
or how big the army is. We just automatically assume that more people is
better.
</p>
<p>
<strong
>You want the minimum amount of labor that allows you to use the other
forms of leverage</strong
>
</p>
<p>
I would argue that this is the worst form of leverage that you could
possibly use. Managing other people is incredibly messy. It requires
tremendous leadership skills. You’re one short hop from a mutiny or
getting eaten or torn apart by the mob.
</p>
<p>
It’s incredibly competed over. Entire civilizations have been destroyed
over this fight. For example, communism, Marxism, is all about the battle
between capital and labor, das kapital and das labor. It’s kind of a trap.
</p>
<p>
You really want to stay out of labor-based leverage. You want the minimum
amount of people working with you that are going to allow you to use the
other forms of leverage, which I would argue are much more interesting.
</p>
<p>
<strong
>Capital has been the dominant form of leverage in the last
century</strong
>
</p>
<p>
The second type of leverage is capital. This one’s a little less hardwired
into us because large amounts of money moving around and being saved and
being invested in money markets, these are inventions of human beings the
in last few hundred to few thousand years. They’re not evolved with us
from hundreds of thousands of years.
</p>
<p>
We understand them a little bit less well. They probably require more
intelligence to use correctly, and the ways in which we use them keep
changing. Management skills from a hundred years ago might still apply
today, but investing in the stock market skills from a hundred years ago
probably don’t apply to the same level today.
</p>
<p>
Capital is a trickier form of leverage to use. It’s more modern. It’s the
one that people have used to get fabulously wealthy in the last century.
It’s probably been the dominant form of leverage in the last century.
</p>
<p>
You can see this by who are the richest people. It’s bankers, politicians
in corrupt countries who print money, essentially people who move large
amounts of money around.
</p>
<p>
If you look at the top of very large companies, outside of technology
companies, in many, many large old companies, the CEO job is really a
financial job. They’re really financial asset managers. Sometimes, an
asset manager can put a pleasant face on it, so you get a Warren Buffet
type.
</p>
<p>
But deep down, I think we all dislike capital as a form of leverage
because it feels unfair. It’s this invisible thing that can be accumulated
and passed across generations and suddenly seems to result in people
having gargantuan amounts of money with nobody else around them or
necessarily sharing in it.
</p>
<p>
That said, capital is a powerful form of leverage. It can be converted to
labor. It can be converted to other things. It’s very surgical, very
analytical.
</p>
<p>
If you are a brilliant investor and give $1 billion and you can make a 30%
return with it, whereas anybody else can only make a 20% return, you’re
going to get all the money and you’re going to get paid very handsomely
for it.
</p>
<p>
It scales very, very well. If you get good at managing capital, you can
manage more and more capital much more easily than you can manage more and
more people.
</p>
<p>
<strong
>You need specific knowledge and accountability to obtain
capital</strong
>
</p>
<p>
It is a good form of leverage, but the hard part with capital is how do
you obtain it? That’s why I talked about specific knowledge and
accountability first.
</p>
<p>
If you have specific knowledge in a domain and if you’re accountable and
you have a good name in that domain, then people are going to give you
capital as a form of leverage that you can use to then go get more
capital.
</p>
<p>
Capital also is fairly well understood. I think a lot of the knocks
against capitalism come because of the accumulation of capital.
</p>
</body>
</html>