diff --git a/response.md b/response.md
deleted file mode 100644
index 9d679e5..0000000
--- a/response.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,76 +0,0 @@
-# Corrections responses
-
-1. Clarify relation between the form factor P(q) and the intensity I(q) (maybe not needed when missing page will be included in the all document page 24-26
-
-This is clarified in the missing pages (see Pages 26-28)
-
-2. Clarify the difference between model-dependent and model independent methods page 24
-
-The following sentences have been added to page 24:
-
- ```
-All types of scattering patterns can be analysed by two analysis methods; model independent and model-dependent.
-Model-independent analysis is where there is no \emph{a priori} information used in the analysis, when there are no assumptions made about the underlaying structure of the sample. 
-However, model-dependent analysis is when reasonable assumptions are made about the structure before the analysis is considered. 
-```
-
-3. Define Ackley function page 33.
-
-Moved the introduction of the ackley function to the end of the paragraph and added the following:
-
-```
-The Ackley function is a common function used for assessing the utility of global optimisation functions, which has the following form in the two-dimensional case, 
-%
-\begin{equation}
-f(x,y) = -a \exp{\big[-b\sqrt{0.5(x^2 + y^2)}\big]} - \exp{\big[0.5(\cos{cx} + \cos{cy})\big]} + e + a,
-\end{equation}
-where, $a$, $b$, and $c$ are constants defined by the user, and $e$ is the base of the natural logarithm. 
-```
-
-4. Page 37. Clarify what is meant by "dynamically relevant structure"
-
-Changed `dynamically` to `thermodynamically`
-
-5. Equation 3.1 page 44, clarify the fitting variables and how the various structural parameters reported in table 3.1 are then obtained (reference to the relevant equation in the reflectometry chapter.)
-
-The following has added following Equation 3.1 
-
-```
-The scattering length for the head or tail of the phospholipid can be found based on the different atom types present in each. 
-Therefore, the volume and solvation fraction are variables that may be fitted to give value for the SLD that may be used in Equation~\ref{equ:knsld}.
-```
-
-Additionally the following has be added to paragraph 4 of page 48 (in the old version)
-
-```
-Therefore, the $\text{SLD}_i$ in Equation~\ref{equ:sld} may be found and used in Equation~\ref{equ:knsld}, while the layer thickness may be used in Equation~\ref{equ:nowthick} to calculate the reflected intensity from a given layer. 
-```
-
-6. Page 44 – define what you mean by "Chemically consistent modelling"
-
-The following sentences have been added to the chemically-consistent modelling section 
-
-```
-Chemically-consistent modelling, in reflectometry analysis, is the reparameterisation of the layer-model into rational chemical terms, such as molecular volume and the elemental scattering lengths. 
-This reparameterisation allows for chemically-realistic constraints to be applied to the model.  
-```
-
-7. P59 Figure 3.6 label a-d.
-
-The labels on these figures were small (in the top left corner), the size has been increased.
-
-8. Page 78 write the Tanford equation
-
-The following has been added to the tanford equation side note 
-
-```
-which has the form $t_t = (1.5 + 1.265)n_c$ \AA, where $t_t$ is the length and $n_c$ is the number of carbon atoms
-```
-
-9. Page 94 Figure 5.7 caption: info on sample (concentration, solvent)
-
-Figure caption changed to 
-
-```
-The experimental SANS data, from a solution of hydrogenated \ce{C_{10}TANO_3} in \ce{D2O} at a concentration of \SI{\sim0.15}{\mol\deci\meter^{-3}}, to which the real \texttt{fitoog} run was attempting to fit.
-```
\ No newline at end of file