You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I like the all the styling of the current Starlight implementation, but I've found working with Astro to be a pain in-editor, and I find the components to be opaque/untuitive. Would much rather just be writing and using React.
Fumadocs (https://fumadocs.vercel.app) looks great, but would likely require a fair amount of translating to get the styles over from the Starlight implementation. Would also require some customization e.g. to preserve the current header layout/animation since at least by default Fumadocs only has a sidebar.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@holic Looks nice. Honestly I basically want the docs to mostly just look the way they do now but be written in a framework that just embraces React, so either would fit the bill.
I guess one nice thing about Fumadocs is that this built-in dropdown concept could be a nice way to split up different projects like @ark/attest and @ark/schema
I like the all the styling of the current Starlight implementation, but I've found working with Astro to be a pain in-editor, and I find the components to be opaque/untuitive. Would much rather just be writing and using React.
Fumadocs (https://fumadocs.vercel.app) looks great, but would likely require a fair amount of translating to get the styles over from the Starlight implementation. Would also require some customization e.g. to preserve the current header layout/animation since at least by default Fumadocs only has a sidebar.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: