Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

relatedimages issue in olm #1643

Open
zlcnju opened this issue Jan 22, 2025 · 1 comment
Open

relatedimages issue in olm #1643

zlcnju opened this issue Jan 22, 2025 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed olm Issue related to the Operator Lifecycle Manager priority: low

Comments

@zlcnju
Copy link

zlcnju commented Jan 22, 2025

I'm using ArgoCD from OperatorHub in a private/air-gapped environment and need to know which images should be synced to my private registry. This information should be defined in the relatedImages section of the CSV (ClusterServiceVersion), but the ArgoCD operator currently lacks this definition.

This makes it challenging to:

  1. Identify all required images for air-gapped installations
  2. Ensure all necessary images are mirrored to private registries
  3. Deploy ArgoCD operator reliably in disconnected environments

Could we add the missing relatedImages section to properly document all required images for the ArgoCD operator?

This would help users in private/air-gapped environments to properly prepare their environments for ArgoCD deployment.

@svghadi svghadi added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 22, 2025
@svghadi
Copy link
Collaborator

svghadi commented Jan 22, 2025

Thanks @zlcnju. Yes. It makes sense to list all required images under relatedImages section to facilitate easy installation in disconnected env.

Contributions are welcomed to resolve this. :)

In the meantime, if you are blocked, you can find all the required images for v0.13.0 in

@svghadi svghadi added help wanted Extra attention is needed olm Issue related to the Operator Lifecycle Manager priority: low labels Jan 22, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request help wanted Extra attention is needed olm Issue related to the Operator Lifecycle Manager priority: low
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants