Replies: 1 comment 9 replies
-
They are the way they are for historical reasons, it would be a breaking change to update. Originally, RSSI was transformed to a "human-friendly" value, with the "Signal" added later for people preferring the dBm value directly. Obviously, we are well aware of what the definitions are, but this is not going to be changed. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
9 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
PROBLEM DESCRIPTION
Hello,
While analyzing data obtained via MQTT, I encountered a problem interpreting Wi-Fi parameters RSSI and Signal. From the values, it seems that both parameters are swapped. RSSI is Receive Signal Strength Indicator and should be reported in dBm, and it is always a negative number. As for the second item, it seems to take values from 0 to 100, and it is probably the CCQ - Client Connection Quality. This parameter is commonly called only connection quality or simple quality.
Is that correct? Is it possible to correct and relabel it?
References:
CCQ - https://wiki.mikrotik.com/wiki/Manual:Wireless_FAQ#What_is_CCQ_and_how_are_the_values_determined?
RSSI - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Received_signal_strength_indication
REQUESTED INFORMATION
Make sure your have performed every step and checked the applicable boxes before submitting your issue. Thank you!
Backlog Template; Module; GPIO 255
:Backlog Rule1; Rule2; Rule3
:Status 0
:weblog
to 4 and then, when you experience your issue, provide the output of the Console log:TO REPRODUCE
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
EXPECTED BEHAVIOUR
A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.
SCREENSHOTS
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.
ADDITIONAL CONTEXT
(Please, remember to close the issue when the problem has been addressed)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions