Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

List of suggested enhancements #9

Open
apryet opened this issue Feb 13, 2015 · 3 comments
Open

List of suggested enhancements #9

apryet opened this issue Feb 13, 2015 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@apryet
Copy link
Owner

apryet commented Feb 13, 2015

A. In a close future ...
=> Optimization of refinement for structured grids
The refinement strategy currently implemented in Qgridder is based on the "propagation" of fixes to topology rules violation with neighboring cells. This is optimized for nested meshes but results in slow refinement operations for structured meshes. As an alternative for structured meshes, we plan to implement row-wise and column-wise cell splitting.
=> Undo capability while refining
It is quite common to refine progressively and observe an issue after several refinement operations. We will shortly propose the capability to undo the 1-4 last operations, depending the mesh size.

B. In a not so close future..
=> Rotation capability
It is sometimes necessary to orientate the mesh in a direction different to north-south, we will provide this capability a the creation of the mesh and the possibility to adjust the rotation angle after refinement.

=> Extension to a finite element mesh with Gmsh
This is under testing but as it is based on a binary Gmsh executable, the distribution of this extension will be plateform dependant.

Feel free to propose enhancements, we'll see if we can implement them !

@apryet apryet self-assigned this Feb 13, 2015
@jkall
Copy link

jkall commented Mar 19, 2015

Would it be possible to use the QGIS delaunay triangulation feature (instead of Gmsh) for the extension to a finite element mesh?

@apryet
Copy link
Owner Author

apryet commented Mar 19, 2015

Thank you for this suggestion, this is an interesting option since it may avoid the dependence on a compiled executable (Gmsh) to build meshes. However Gmsh allows the construction of meshes with quadrilateral elements, as required by SUTRA (USGS), which makes it interesting.

@jkall
Copy link

jkall commented Mar 19, 2015

I see, that is a good reason for using Gmsh indeed. Thank you for the information.
Looking forward to test this feature (and the others) whenever you get time to complete them.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants