-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 147
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add optional chain argument to starknet.id hooks #420
Comments
Yes, happy to accept a contribution for this. The hooks should accept a new optional argument |
Hello @fracek I'm open to work on this. |
Hey @raizo07 I assigned the issue to you. |
Alright, I'm on it.
…On Sun, Mar 24, 2024, 7:48 PM Francesco Ceccon ***@***.***> wrote:
Hey @raizo07 <https://github.com/raizo07> I assigned the issue to you.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#420 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ATKSYSWV3DTHISDFBL5T77TYZ4NX3AVCNFSM6AAAAABFB7Y4VSVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDAMJWHEYDGNJXGI>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Hi @fracek based on this documentation But in the comment above you suggested we use a |
Hey, yes starknet-react uses a |
is there any progress on this? |
For a better testnet dapp experience, and to enable access to starknet.id on L3s, it is required to fetch starknet.id from mainnet instead of the connected chain.
Suggestion: Add an optional
chainId
argument (e.g.SN_MAIN
) touseStarkAddress ()
,useStarkName ()
anduseStarkProfile()
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: