Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature][Connector-V2] Introduce integration with chatgpt. #4749

Closed
3 tasks done
liugddx opened this issue May 15, 2023 · 6 comments
Closed
3 tasks done

[Feature][Connector-V2] Introduce integration with chatgpt. #4749

liugddx opened this issue May 15, 2023 · 6 comments
Assignees

Comments

@liugddx
Copy link
Member

liugddx commented May 15, 2023

Search before asking

  • I had searched in the feature and found no similar feature requirement.

Description

At present, chatgpt is very hot, and it has penetrated into all walks of life. However, since chatgpt is trained based on public data, it cannot achieve the desired effect due to the lack of relevant data training in special fields. So we need to train chatgpt with private data. So I think it is necessary to integrate seatunnel and chatgpt to accomplish this.

The following are the steps of my research:

  1. Format private data
  2. Upload vector database
  3. Integration with chatgpt

refer to:
https://gpt-index.readthedocs.io/en/latest/how_to/data_connectors.html
https://gpt-index.readthedocs.io/en/latest/how_to/integrations/chatgpt_plugins.html
https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/618628617

98ef0c4aff32a2dbedb48e54a17921c

Usage Scenario

No response

Related issues

No response

Are you willing to submit a PR?

  • Yes I am willing to submit a PR!

Code of Conduct

@liugddx liugddx self-assigned this May 15, 2023
@liugddx
Copy link
Member Author

liugddx commented May 16, 2023

@liugddx
Copy link
Member Author

liugddx commented May 17, 2023

f900be99f3ecd5cc7e6a600f61e9402

@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity for 30 days. It will be closed in next 7 days if no further activity occurs.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Jun 17, 2023
@liugddx liugddx removed the stale label Jun 21, 2023
@liugddx
Copy link
Member Author

liugddx commented Jun 21, 2023

#4885

@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity for 30 days. It will be closed in next 7 days if no further activity occurs.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale label Jul 22, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link

This issue has been closed because it has not received response for too long time. You could reopen it if you encountered similar problems in the future.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant