Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DataFusion weekly project plan (Andrew Lamb) - April 1, 2024 #9899

Closed
5 of 7 tasks
alamb opened this issue Apr 1, 2024 · 14 comments
Closed
5 of 7 tasks

DataFusion weekly project plan (Andrew Lamb) - April 1, 2024 #9899

alamb opened this issue Apr 1, 2024 · 14 comments
Assignees

Comments

@alamb
Copy link
Contributor

alamb commented Apr 1, 2024

Follow on to #9796

It would be great for other contributors to DataFusion who plan non trivial work could try to make them visible somehow as well 🙏 (feel free to copy / modify the format)

My Highlights from Last Week

My (personal) goals

1000 projects are built using DataFusion 📈

My (personal) plans for this week

Project Queue (list of future projects)

Projects I plan to help actively help review / plan

Algorithm for (my) prioritizing PR reviews

Note there are many committers who can and do review and merge PRs, so this is not the priorities of the project as a whole, just the approximate algorithm I use to prioritize my own time

Priority:

  1. Bug fixes (where something is just incorrect), especially regressions (where it used to work and now does not)
  2. Improvements directly related to features needed for InfluxDB (my employer)
  3. Documentation and test improvements (I view these as very strategically important)
  4. PRs that I think are strategically important
  5. Other new features / additions to functionality (note this is the lowest)

The top strategically important projects in my head are:

Thus, if you are interested in contributing to DataFusion and are interested in a fast turn around time I would recommend looking into bug fixes / test improvements / documentation or the projects named above

If you propose adding new functionality, the review cycle will likely be longer. You can make it a shorter cycle by looking at the comments on other recent PRs and following the same model (e.g. ensure there are tests in sqllogictest for example, the CI passes, includes documentation, etc)

Background

The idea of this ticket is make my plans for DataFusion visible, largely for my own personal organizational needs, but also to:

  1. Communicate / coordinate in the community
  2. Help provide an interesting summary of what is happening in DataFusion this week
@matthewmturner
Copy link
Contributor

Really interested to see your thoughts on custom indices, its something were currently working on to improve performance of listing table.

@seddonm1
Copy link
Contributor

seddonm1 commented Apr 3, 2024

Sorry for the location and possibly dumb question, but shouldn't all functions be exported here: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/blob/main/datafusion/functions/src/unicode/mod.rs#L138

I am probably using the library incorrectly but (for example) LENGTH will not be registered by the central context here: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/blob/2f550032140d42d1ee6d8ed86f7790766fa7302e/datafusion/core/src/execution/context/mod.rs#L1450

@alamb
Copy link
Contributor Author

alamb commented Apr 3, 2024

Hi @seddonm1 👋

Sorry for the location and possibly dumb question, but shouldn't all functions be exported here: https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/blob/main/datafusion/functions/src/unicode/mod.rs#L138

Yes that is the intention

I am probably using the library incorrectly but (for example) LENGTH will not be registered by the central context here:

https://github.com/apache/arrow-datafusion/blob/2f550032140d42d1ee6d8ed86f7790766fa7302e/datafusion/core/src/execution/context/mod.rs#L1450

I think length is registered as an alias of character_length

@seddonm1
Copy link
Contributor

seddonm1 commented Apr 3, 2024

Thanks @alamb . If you look at the first link I cannot see anywhere where the length alias is actually registered. My queries which previously worked started failing after this update. I haven't investigated if more functions have also not been registered.

@Omega359
Copy link
Contributor

Omega359 commented Apr 4, 2024

@alamb
Copy link
Contributor Author

alamb commented Apr 4, 2024

DataFusion 37.0.0 is released: #9682 🌮

@seddonm1
Copy link
Contributor

seddonm1 commented Apr 4, 2024

@alamb
Copy link
Contributor Author

alamb commented Apr 5, 2024

BTW something cool for next week -- @milenkovicm WASM UDFs #9326 / #9326 (comment) / https://github.com/milenkovicm/wasaffi

@alamb
Copy link
Contributor Author

alamb commented Apr 5, 2024

Really interested to see your thoughts on custom indices, its something were currently working on to improve performance of listing table.

In case anyone else is following along, here are some items related to indexing:

While I had this on the brain, @matthewmturner I also filed #9964 as I suspect others will be interested in helping make ListingTable faster too

@alamb
Copy link
Contributor Author

alamb commented Apr 5, 2024

Reviews:
@jayzhan211 is starting to pull aggregate functions out of the core: #9960

@alamb
Copy link
Contributor Author

alamb commented Apr 8, 2024

Next week #10002

@alamb alamb closed this as completed Apr 8, 2024
@alamb alamb unpinned this issue Apr 8, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants