Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: generate random index name for change streams #32689

Open
wants to merge 12 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

thiagotnunes
Copy link
Contributor

Generates index names for change stream partition metadata table using a random UUID. This prevents issues if the job is being redeployed in an existing database.

Generates index names for change stream partition metadata table using a
random UUID. This prevents issues if the job is being redeployed in an
existing database.
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 8, 2024

Checks are failing. Will not request review until checks are succeeding. If you'd like to override that behavior, comment assign set of reviewers

@thiagotnunes
Copy link
Contributor Author

retest this please

Finds and drops all indexes on the metadata table before attempting to
drop it.
If a table is given, we still need to generate the index names in case
the given table does not exist and needs to be created.
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 9, 2024

Assigning reviewers. If you would like to opt out of this review, comment assign to next reviewer:

R: @damondouglas for label java.
R: @ahmedabu98 for label io.
R: @nielm for label spanner.

Available commands:

  • stop reviewer notifications - opt out of the automated review tooling
  • remind me after tests pass - tag the comment author after tests pass
  • waiting on author - shift the attention set back to the author (any comment or push by the author will return the attention set to the reviewers)

The PR bot will only process comments in the main thread (not review comments).

@nielm
Copy link
Contributor

nielm commented Oct 11, 2024

Is this a fix for issue #32509? If so, can you add a "fixes: " in the description please?
@thiagotnunes

@nielm
Copy link
Contributor

nielm commented Oct 11, 2024

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants