Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Bug]: v5 performance needs to be improved #6591

Closed
2 of 10 tasks
xiaoxiaofu1 opened this issue Dec 3, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed
2 of 10 tasks

[Bug]: v5 performance needs to be improved #6591

xiaoxiaofu1 opened this issue Dec 3, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
bug 🐛 Something isn't working performance v5 waiting for author Further information is requested from the author.

Comments

@xiaoxiaofu1
Copy link

Describe the bug / 问题描述

同样节点数量情况下v4很流畅,v5性能明显下降。渲染时常变慢,拖拽缩放严重卡顿,切换选中状态当数量多时也严重卡顿。关闭了动画,开启了optimize-viewport-transform仍然有这些问题

Reproduction link / 复现链接

No response

Steps to Reproduce the Bug or Issue / 重现步骤

No response

G6 Version / G6 版本

🆕 5.x

OS / 操作系统

  • macOS
  • Windows
  • Linux
  • Others / 其他

Browser / 浏览器

  • Chrome
  • Edge
  • Firefox
  • Safari (Limited support / 有限支持)
  • IE (Nonsupport / 不支持)
  • Others / 其他
@xiaoxiaofu1 xiaoxiaofu1 added the bug 🐛 Something isn't working label Dec 3, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title [Bug]: v5性能需要提升 [Bug]: v5 performance needs to be improved Dec 3, 2024
@Aarebecca
Copy link
Contributor

画布中元素数量大概有多少?

@yvonneyx yvonneyx added the waiting for author Further information is requested from the author. label Dec 4, 2024
Copy link

Since the issue is missing key information and has been inactive for 7 days, it has been automatically closed. If you wish to see the issue reopened, please provide the missing information. | 由于该 issue 缺少关键信息且已闲置 7 天,现已自动关闭。如需重新打开此问题,请提供所缺失的信息。。

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug 🐛 Something isn't working performance v5 waiting for author Further information is requested from the author.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants