-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 100
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Revisit descriptions of the various libraries we have #824
Comments
@RobPasMue just curious to know what the scope of this will be. |
I wanted to keep it simple honestly. The goal was to adapt the metapackage only, which is the entry point for most users. Each library should be responsible of adapting their stuff IMO. If they want to keep the "Pythonic interface" term, maintainers should be the one calling the shots in their respective libraries. Creating a tool for search&replacing has very low ROI. I would just do the search and replace myself. |
Yes, this task can and should remain manual as it is limited. |
I just updated PyMAPDL. See description: https://github.com/ansys/pymapdl and ansys/pymapdl#3797 |
Do you want to submit the change to this repo too @germa89 ? |
Done! #882 |
As pointed out in the dev meeting, we should revisit the descriptions for our various packages and move from "Pythonic interface" to "Python client library" or "Python library" in most cases. Pinging @ansys/pyansys-core in case anybody wants to take the lead on the proposal
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: