Skip to content

issues Search Results · repo:angr/angrop language:Python

Filter by

47 results
 (58 ms)

47 results

inangr/angrop (press backspace or delete to remove)

Description You know what would be cool? A CLI. # angrop --blah blah blah mybin some good stuff Would make this a hell of a lot more approachable. Alternatives No response Additional context No ...
enhancement
  • zardus
  • Opened 
    20 days ago
  • #132

Description I run the code as it is said in the readme and I get this. Traceback (most recent call last): File /home/kali/tdde63/myenv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/angrop/gadget_finder/gadget_analyzer.py ...
bug
  • whooshadow
  • 7
  • Opened 
    on Oct 2, 2024
  • #121

Question Guys, what am I doing wrong? The code from the example gives an error. import angr, angrop p = angr.Project( /bin/ls ) rop = p.analyses.ROP() rop.find_gadgets() AttributeError: SimSolver ...
question
  • gr0grig
  • 3
  • Opened 
    on Aug 30, 2024
  • #118

Description 2024-07-22T17:53:27.5548253Z ====================================================================== 2024-07-22T17:53:27.5549064Z ERROR: test_chainbuilder.test_arm_func_call 2024-07-22T17:53:27.5550150Z ...
bug
  • twizmwazin
  • 1
  • Opened 
    on Jul 22, 2024
  • #115

Question I m looking for a func_call gadget in my mips binary. Using ropper tool I ve found this valid gadget: move $a1, $s1 jalr $s3 move $a2, $s0 lw $ra, 0x48($sp) lw $s1, 0x48+var_24($sp) ...
enhancement
  • yamazaki15
  • 1
  • Opened 
    on Jul 1, 2024
  • #114

Description While using angrop on x86, a syscall gadget containing the x86_64 syscall instruction was identified for use in an example rop chain. This the x86_64 syscall instruction is not valid on x86, ...
bug
  • astewart-bah
  • 3
  • Opened 
    on Apr 26, 2024
  • #104

Description This issue boils down to the order of operations. Angrop currently thinks 0x10 is added to rsp, and then the return address is popped from the stack. The correct order of events is that the ...
bug
  • astewart-bah
  • 2
  • Opened 
    on Apr 26, 2024
  • #103

Description It looks like angrop discards gadgets that have a stack shift 0x100 bytes (MAX_PIVOT_BYTES). In two recent projects, I have found it necessary to jump to a distant portion of the stack. While ...
bug
  • astewart-bah
  • 2
  • Opened 
    on Apr 26, 2024
  • #102

Description do_syscall does not work with the blob backend anymore. Steps to reproduce the bug Consider this minimal example: import angr, angrop with open( /tmp/test , wb ) as f: f.write(b \x58\xC3\x0F\x05 ...
bug
  • Ordoviz
  • 2
  • Opened 
    on Apr 21, 2024
  • #100

Description angrop assumes that pop ds; ret; gadgets are acceptable for shifting 8 bytes on the stack. This is a bad assumption, and causes failed chains. The below is the output of the included example ...
bug
  • astewart-bah
  • 3
  • Opened 
    on Apr 15, 2024
  • #98
Issue origami icon

Learn how you can use GitHub Issues to plan and track your work.

Save views for sprints, backlogs, teams, or releases. Rank, sort, and filter issues to suit the occasion. The possibilities are endless.Learn more about GitHub Issues
ProTip! 
Press the
/
key to activate the search input again and adjust your query.
Issue origami icon

Learn how you can use GitHub Issues to plan and track your work.

Save views for sprints, backlogs, teams, or releases. Rank, sort, and filter issues to suit the occasion. The possibilities are endless.Learn more about GitHub Issues
ProTip! 
Restrict your search to the title by using the in:title qualifier.
Issue search results · GitHub