Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
190 lines (149 loc) · 7.16 KB

ci.rst

File metadata and controls

190 lines (149 loc) · 7.16 KB

CI: continous integration support

CI module in SQUAD

This subsystem has the following features:

  • receiving test job requests
  • submitting test job requests to test execution backends
  • pulling test job results from test execution backends

The data model for the CI subsystem looks like this:

+---------+    +---------+    +------------------------+
| TestJob |--->| Backend |--->| Backend implementation |
+---------+    +---------+    +------------------------+
     |
     |         +---------------------+
     +-------->| TestRun (from core) |
               +---------------------+

TestJob holds the data related to a test job request. This test job is going to be submitted to a Backend, and after SQUAD gets results back from that backend, it will create a TestRun object with the results data. A Backend is a representation of a given test execution system, such as a LAVA server, or Jenkins. Backend contains the necessary data to access the backend, such as URL, username and password, etc, while Backend implementation encapsulates the details on how to interact with that type of system (e.g. API calls, etc). So for example you can have multiple backends of the same type (e.g. different 2 LAVA servers).

For the CI loop integration to work, you need to run a few extra processes beyond the web interface. See :ref:`production_install_ref_label` for details.

Submitting test job requests

The API is the following

POST /api/submitjob/:group/:project/:build/:environment

  • group, project, build and environment are used to identify which project/build/environment will be used to record the results of the test job.
  • The following data must be submitted as POST parameters:
    • backend: name of a registered backend, to which this test job will be submitted.
    • definition: test job definition. The contents and format are backend-specific. If it is more convenient, the definition can also be submitted as a file upload instead of as a POST parameter.

Example (with test job definition as POST parameter):

$ DEFINITION="$(cat /path/to/definition.txt)"
$ curl \
    --header "Auth-Token: $SQUAD_TOKEN" \
    --form backend=lava \
    --form definition="$DEFINITION" \
    https://squad.example.com/api/submitjob/my-group/my-project/x.y.z/my-ci-env

Example (with test job definition as file upload):

$ curl \
    --header "Auth-Token: $SQUAD_TOKEN" \
    --form backend=lava \
    --form definition=@/path/to/definition.txt \
    https://squad.example.com/api/submitjob/my-group/my-project/x.y.z/my-ci-env

Submitting test job watch requests

Test job watch request are similar to test job requests. The only difference is that some other service submitted the test job for execution and SQUAD is requested to track the progress. After test job is finished SQUAD will retrieve the results and do post processing. The API is following:

POST /api/submitjob/:group/:project/:build/:environment

  • group, project, build and environment are used to identify which project/build/environment will be used to record the results of the test job.
  • The following data must be submitted as POST parameters:
    • backend: name of a registered backend, to which this test job was be submitted.
    • testjob_id: test job ID. The contents and format are backend-specific.

Example (with test job definition as POST parameter):

$ curl \
    --header "Auth-Token: $SQUAD_TOKEN" \
    --form backend=lava \
    --form testjob_id=123456 \
    https://squad.example.com/api/watchjob/my-group/my-project/x.y.z/my-ci-env

Backend settings

Backends support internal settings that are stored in the database. It is assumed that settings are a valid YAML markup.

Supported backends

Out of the box SQUAD supports following backends:

LAVA

SQUAD supports only LAVA v2. Old version of LAVA was made obsolete with 2017.11 LAVA release.

LAVA backend supports the following settings:
  • CI_LAVA_INFRA_ERROR_MESSAGES a list of strings that cause automated job resubmission when matched in the LAVA error message
  • CI_LAVA_SEND_ADMIN_EMAIL boolean flag that prevents sending admin emails for each resubmitted job when set to False
  • CI_LAVA_HANDLE_SUITE boolean flag that parses results from LAVA test suite when set to True. Please note that this option can be overwritten by having the same option with different value in Project project_settings
  • CI_LAVA_CLONE_MEASUREMENTS boolean flag that allows to save LAVA result as both Test and Measurement when set to True. Default is False. Can be overwritten for each project separately (similar to CI_LAVA_HANDLE_SUITE).
  • CI_LAVA_HANDLE_BOOT boolean flag that parses LAVA auto-login-action as a boot test when set to True. Default is False. Can be overwritten for each project separately (similar to CI_LAVA_HANDLE_SUITE). NOTE: Before SQUAD 1.x series, the default behavior was to always process auto-login-action as boot. After 1.x, the default behavior has changed to do the opposite.
  • CI_LAVA_WORK_AROUND_INFRA_ERRORS boolean flag that allows to accept test results from 'Incomplete' jobs if the failure was caused by infrastracture. NOTE: Use with caution!
  • CI_LAVA_JOB_ERROR_STATUS string that coincides with the LAVA job health. Used when sending email notifications for the ON_ERROR notification strategy

Example LAVA backend settings:

CI_LAVA_INFRA_ERROR_MESSAGES:
  - 'Connection closed'
  - 'lava_test_shell connection dropped.'
  - 'fastboot-flash-action timed out'
  - 'u-boot-interrupt timed out'
  - 'enter-vexpress-mcc timed out'
  - 'Unable to fetch git repository'
CI_LAVA_SEND_ADMIN_EMAIL: False
CI_LAVA_HANDLE_SUITE: True

Multinode

SQUAD supports fetching results from LAVA multinode jobs. There are however a few limitations with this setup:

  • All results from multinode will share environment name Since test jobs are submitted via SQUAD using the environment from submit URL there is no way for SQUAD to distinguish between different environmens on different parts of multinode job.
  • Resubmit will repeat the whole set In SQUAD all parts of multinode job will share the multinode definition. For this reason re-submitting any part of the multinode job will result in new multinode job that includes all parts.
  • Each part of the multinode job will be retrieved separately This means that each part will create a TestRun in SQUAD. This should not be a major issue as all results will still be available. Users need to make sure that the test names don't overlap as SQUAD will not have any means of distinguishing between identically named tests from different parts of multinode job.