You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The FK is 100x slower than IK. I understand there is probably some symbolic computation happening for this FK, but is there a faster version somewhere in this library?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
What is your use case? If you are not interested in batching, I guess numpy or casadi probably should give you a faster fk (for casadi especially if you are using common subexpression elimination, see #86).
By the way, how are you computing self.fast_c in your snippet? To get some a fast optimization-based IK, I guess you have some sort of fast FK to use inside the cost function?
@traversaro Thanks for your comment - the problem was not using the jitted version of forward kinematics. It is close to 0 compute time with the jitted version.
Hi,
Is there any way to get a fast forward kinematics from this library?
Here's the speed for inverse kinematics and the speed for forward kinematics:
IK time 0.0021796226501464844
FK time 0.22966623306274414
This is our IK function using scipy optimization:
forward kinematics:
We are using jax.
The FK is 100x slower than IK. I understand there is probably some symbolic computation happening for this FK, but is there a faster version somewhere in this library?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: