You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
hello, i am confused anbout the meanmaper, the input : layer 2: (B784, 1, 51233) layer3: (B784, 1, 102433), meanmaper: F.adaptive_average_pooling(input,1024), it is right for the layer 3 form 102433 to 1024 that is local aggregation of neighboord with patchsize 3, while the layer2 , i am confused, 51233 average pool to 1024, that seems unequal to the former, only 5 in a patch 9 be aggregrated to average, and that is computed twice to get two output in a neighborhood, so that the dimension matchs with former 1024. i am wondering if we can make 51233 to 512 and then interpolate to 1024, that makes use of the whole neighboreed information. looking forward to your reply!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
hello, i am confused anbout the meanmaper, the input : layer 2: (B784, 1, 51233) layer3: (B784, 1, 102433), meanmaper: F.adaptive_average_pooling(input,1024), it is right for the layer 3 form 102433 to 1024 that is local aggregation of neighboord with patchsize 3, while the layer2 , i am confused, 51233 average pool to 1024, that seems unequal to the former, only 5 in a patch 9 be aggregrated to average, and that is computed twice to get two output in a neighborhood, so that the dimension matchs with former 1024. i am wondering if we can make 51233 to 512 and then interpolate to 1024, that makes use of the whole neighboreed information. looking forward to your reply!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: