You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
There were a list of links present that had the associated date present as to when the research was undertaken. The information in relation to the date was not included within the programmatical link and associated via text. Including this content within the programmatical link will provide more information to screen reader users when viewing the page out of context.
DAC's proposed solution
We suggest including the associated date within the link text. As a result of this, it will provide screen readers with more information when viewing the page out of context.
Disagreement
I don't think the date is what's important here, it's more important to give context to the link, for example saying it's a blog post or even repeating its title, or mentioning it's a plan on GitHub, etc.
Additional instances
As this can potentially happen on any page, this work should include checking all the other pages other links missing context.
It might be worth making two different cards for this: One for checking and recording all instances, the other for fixing them.
To save time, it makes sense to audit all the body copy issues together:
This issue is from the accessibility audit of the Design System website by DAC in July 2024.
DAC's description
There were a list of links present that had the associated date present as to when the research was undertaken. The information in relation to the date was not included within the programmatical link and associated via text. Including this content within the programmatical link will provide more information to screen reader users when viewing the page out of context.
DAC's proposed solution
We suggest including the associated date within the link text. As a result of this, it will provide screen readers with more information when viewing the page out of context.
Disagreement
I don't think the date is what's important here, it's more important to give context to the link, for example saying it's a blog post or even repeating its title, or mentioning it's a plan on GitHub, etc.
Additional instances
As this can potentially happen on any page, this work should include checking all the other pages other links missing context.
It might be worth making two different cards for this: One for checking and recording all instances, the other for fixing them.
To save time, it makes sense to audit all the body copy issues together:
Needed roles
Content designer
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: