-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 242
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update and restructure documentation in Frontend and Design System sites for v4 and v5 #2186
Comments
@vanitabarrett @EoinShaughnessy @Ciandelle , Claire (new tech writer) and I had a chat There are 2 sets of documentation we are concerned about 1) Frontend docs and 2) Design System website In the past, when we've done breaking changes, we no longer actively support previous version and tell our users to upgrade to the latest version. However, for this next breaking change, we will support (outlined in the proposal) V4 for 12 months. This means that we may want to make older documentation semi-permanently available.
We suspect that using Netlify link, link previous times, will not be sufficient as users may not trust it. We may also bump into an issue similar to hosting prototypes on Heroku and it being flagged by Google as 'insecure' We are concerned that users will be confused about whether they are looking at V4 or V5 content on the website. Is the 'archive banner' we have on v3 docs enough? We're not sure if there are specific content we need to write about V4 or V5. For example from the proposal, V4 will remain compliant with WCAG 2.1 and not later versions and V5 will eventually become compliant with WCAG 2.2 and any future versions. Are we obligated to help users on V4 to understand the differences and how they might stay compliant? Tasks
|
Re-added failed beta task list. |
I think this is done. |
What
We need to decide what v5 documentation is needed and how we want to continue providing documentation for users who will stay on v4.0.0 of GOV.UK Frontend
Why
See our browser proposal for more details.
Who needs to work on this
Developers; Designers; Tech Writer
Who needs to review this
Developers; Designers; Tech Writer
Done when
Infrastructure - git
Infrastructure - hosting
Content
Tasks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: