You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hello,
I would like to know your outlook for Sensor Logger?
I like the basic idea of it, but I need something more generic. I need to record different data from financial data, metrics (like humidity you have), counters (like download stats).
Your datamodel is tied very much to measuring a metric but a generic setup in a star schema would be interesting (fact table = value; dimension for type like sensor or account; dimension attributes like groups or units)
any plan to go that way - or you want to purely rely on the sensor-api-idea?
Regards,
Rello
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi @Rello
Thanx for you question and sorry for beeing a bit late.
Well, it is possible to store almost any type of data. To server a gerneric way for data aggregation, grouping and adding custom attributes is the challenge. And no, i didn't think of changing the datamodel yet, but never say never and may be now is the right time.
If you'r interested to help to improve SensorLogger you are warmly welcome.
Hello,
I would like to know your outlook for Sensor Logger?
I like the basic idea of it, but I need something more generic. I need to record different data from financial data, metrics (like humidity you have), counters (like download stats).
Your datamodel is tied very much to measuring a metric but a generic setup in a star schema would be interesting (fact table = value; dimension for type like sensor or account; dimension attributes like groups or units)
any plan to go that way - or you want to purely rely on the sensor-api-idea?
Regards,
Rello
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: