Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Documentation management #32

Open
6 of 9 tasks
Davsarper opened this issue Jun 2, 2023 · 3 comments
Open
6 of 9 tasks

Documentation management #32

Davsarper opened this issue Jun 2, 2023 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
Core DSH (ELA) SATRE Story Issue of issues, longer than a month TRESA

Comments

@Davsarper
Copy link
Contributor

Davsarper commented Jun 2, 2023

Goal Title

Comprehensive and clear documentation for the DSH, SATRE & TRESA will ensure open, reproducible outputs from this project.

Description

  • Ensure all relevant information is captured in documentation
  • Test accessibility and discoverability of docs with relevant groups
  • Iterate documentation in line with wider project work (e.g. TRESA processes, DSH updates)
  • Determine what can/can't be documented (e.g. from an IG perspective).

Definition of Done

When funding ends for the project and we have openly documented everything that we feel we can

Details

  • RACI
    • Accountable team or person: RAM, RCM
    • Responsible team or person: REG, RPM
    • Informed and consulted people:
  • Estimated effort
  • FTE: 0.2
  • REG Support FTE 0.05 (ongoing effort low, may have spikes) - added by RPM
  • RPM: 0.05 (higher but already included in RPM Accountable tasks)

Task and issue breakdown

Breakdown in specific tasks of maximum a month duration, tasks and issues may be added as necessary
Issues may span across repositories when necessary

  • issue alan-turing-institute/data-safe-haven-team#X
  • issue alan-turing-institute/data-safe-haven#X
  • issue alan-turing-institute/trusted-research
  • issue sa-tre/satre-specification#X
  • issue sa-tre/satre-team#X

Checklist

  • This Story have been agreed with project members, it tackles prioritised work
    • If not: Label as ForPrioritisation so it discussed in the next monthly meeting, do not set a status
  • I have filled in the Team Accountabe field
  • I have included this Story in the agreed upon Milestone, set status as Planned
    • If not: set status as Backlog, to be Planned via weekly meetings or async discussions
  • The work to be done is likely to span over a month
  • I have broken down the work in monthly issues and added them above
  • I have labeled this issue according to its main project: SATRE, TRESA, CORE DSH (ELA) or other (please agree and create a new label if necessary)
  • I have stimated the total effort and added it in the body (under Details) but left the issue field blank
@Davsarper
Copy link
Contributor Author

@jemrobinson & REG what effort from you do you think this would take? Considering you are not Accountable but do contribute to it and are Responsible.
Similar to #27 but also beyond (DSH docs may not only be TRESA docs)

@jemrobinson
Copy link
Member

Finalising a first version of the docs is probably several FTE weeks work in each case. Ongoing maintenance should be very low once this is done.

@Davsarper
Copy link
Contributor Author

October: best effort situtation, Hari on leave most of the time.
Pulumi will require a new push on docs in November. A sprint week could be a good solution for it

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Core DSH (ELA) SATRE Story Issue of issues, longer than a month TRESA
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants