Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Summary missing information (Input Structure PK) #1049

Closed
AndresOrtegaGuerrero opened this issue Jan 3, 2025 · 3 comments · Fixed by #1051
Closed

Summary missing information (Input Structure PK) #1049

AndresOrtegaGuerrero opened this issue Jan 3, 2025 · 3 comments · Fixed by #1051
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@AndresOrtegaGuerrero
Copy link
Member

When displaying the workflow summary, the PK of the input structure should be shown under Structure Properties. This helps users identify which PK to use for subsequent calculations involving the same structure.

Additionally, it should be clearly defined whether Structure Properties refers to the input structure or the relaxed structure.

Displaying the PK is crucial because, after the workflow finishes, it can be challenging to locate, especially since it is not available in the Input Structure tab.

image

or even if you go to the step 1 to see the structure ,
image

@AndresOrtegaGuerrero AndresOrtegaGuerrero added the enhancement New feature or request label Jan 3, 2025
@AndresOrtegaGuerrero
Copy link
Member Author

@edan-bainglass

@edan-bainglass edan-bainglass self-assigned this Jan 3, 2025
@edan-bainglass
Copy link
Member

edan-bainglass commented Jan 3, 2025

Displaying the PK is crucial because, after the workflow finishes, it can be challenging to locate, especially since it is not available in the Input Structure tab.

Thanks for the tag!

Add PK for initial structure for sure! Regarding the initial vs. relaxed in summary - clearly initial, as we don't have info on the final structure when the job starts. Everything in the summary is "initial". Should I change the section title to "Initial structure properties"? Would that help? Note that the PK will again be of the initial structure. The PK of the final structure should be added somewhere in the structure results viewer.

@edan-bainglass
Copy link
Member

You're assigned to #1050. I think you can add the PK as part of resolving that one?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants