Five steps

[edan-bainglass]

Step 3 always seemed like it was doing too much, both setting the resources AND submitting the job. I propose we split it in two, with step 3 setting the resources (it gets its own confirm button), and step 4 submitting the job, optionally setting the label and description.

So basically:

1. Choose a structure
2. Configure the calculation parameters
3. Select the resources
4. Submit the workflow
5. Monitor and view results

@giovannipizzi @cpignedoli thoughts?

[cpignedoli]

One could then think it's too many steps but given I consider extremely important to focus on providing meaningful labels and descriptions I personally welcome your suggestion @edan-bainglass.

[giovannipizzi]

I agree on splitting, it allows also, in the last step, to

1. Show a summary of the selection, for confirmation (essentially, the same as the workflow summary that would be shown after submitting, if it's easy to do so?)

2. In addition to label and description, one could set other metadata (e.g. add some extras/tags/keywords, or more importantly pick some groups to which the workflow should be added, as soon as submitted; in general, suggesting what we think people should do, and then using these as filtering strategies in the job list)

3. Also here show again a summary of possible warnings (too few resources, etc, nothing new, only those already implemented)

4. In the future one could have here some estimate of the expected wall time or cost, for instance

Note: the points above can be moved to a later, Lower priority issue, after the simple separation with only label/description setting)