You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current use of Influx in NTMI is linear: interface control outputs are weighted by a matrix, and the resulting output is linearly mapped to process control inputs.
The Influx quark has an example for terrain-like remapping on the influx output, which makes the range of accessible areas in parameter space much wider: https://github.com/supercollider-quarks/Influx/blob/master/Examples/Remap_Influx_by_envelope.scd
It would make sense to include this option in the NTMI, maybe as 3 steps:
1 - linear mapping as was, maybe with tanh compression
2 - remapping by simple terrain envelope, e.g. with 7 steps
3 - remapping with more complex envelope, e.g. 11 or 13 values.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The current use of Influx in NTMI is linear: interface control outputs are weighted by a matrix, and the resulting output is linearly mapped to process control inputs.
The Influx quark has an example for terrain-like remapping on the influx output, which makes the range of accessible areas in parameter space much wider:
https://github.com/supercollider-quarks/Influx/blob/master/Examples/Remap_Influx_by_envelope.scd
It would make sense to include this option in the NTMI, maybe as 3 steps:
1 - linear mapping as was, maybe with tanh compression
2 - remapping by simple terrain envelope, e.g. with 7 steps
3 - remapping with more complex envelope, e.g. 11 or 13 values.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: