Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Mobile v15 stock reconciliation scanning #263

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: mobile_v15
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

lauty95
Copy link
Collaborator

@lauty95 lauty95 commented Feb 27, 2025

Stock Reconciliation Handling Scanning

Demo

Screen.Recording.2025-02-27.at.3.31.30.PM.mov

@lauty95 lauty95 requested review from Alchez and agritheory and removed request for Alchez February 27, 2025 18:39
@lauty95 lauty95 self-assigned this Feb 27, 2025
@lauty95 lauty95 linked an issue Feb 27, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 27, 2025

Coverage

Coverage Report
FileStmtsMissCoverMissing
__init__.py10100% 
beam
   barcodes.py331457%18, 27, 29, 31, 34, 45–46, 48–49, 54–56, 60–61
   handling_unit.py813754%25, 31, 63–65, 83, 94–95, 101–102, 104–105, 107–108, 110–111, 113, 115–118, 120–122, 124, 126, 128–129, 134, 136, 140, 142–143, 146, 148–149, 157
   printing.py61610%4–6, 8, 11–12, 15–16, 18–21, 24–25, 34–45, 47–54, 58–59, 61–62, 71–75, 78–79, 85–87, 90–91, 94–95, 97–99, 101–102, 104, 109, 111–112
beam/demand
   demand.py3227776%51, 66, 123, 209, 243, 290, 293, 425–426, 428–429, 432–433, 435, 439–444, 446, 448–449, 452, 457, 459–464, 466, 468, 471, 474, 479, 483–485, 490–491, 493, 495–497, 499, 505, 507–510, 512–515, 517, 519, 522–523, 525–526, 529, 543, 560–561, 563–565, 621, 625, 662, 667, 674, 695–696, 708, 837
   receiving.py111496%79, 131, 173, 214
   sqlite.py59198%40
   utils.py59788%56, 67, 72–75, 83
beam/doctype/beam_mobile_route
   beam_mobile_route.py30100% 
beam/doctype/beam_settings
   beam_settings.py281739%33–35, 38–39, 41, 48, 53–56, 64–66, 70–72
beam/doctype/handling_unit
   __init__.py9366%12–14
   handling_unit.py150100% 
beam/doctype/warehouse_types
   warehouse_types.py30100% 
beam/overrides
   sales_order.py10640%11–16
   stock_entry.py671774%61–62, 67–74, 80–81, 97, 112, 129, 132–133
   work_order.py10280%14, 16
beam/report/demand_map
   demand_map.py35350%4–5, 7–8, 11–12, 15–16, 103–111, 127, 129–143, 146–147
beam/report/handling_unit_traceability
   handling_unit_traceability.py44440%4–6, 9–11, 30–32, 34–35, 37–38, 41–42, 45–46, 48–49, 51–52, 54–55, 57, 63–65, 67–69, 71, 74–77, 79–81, 83–86, 89–90
beam/scan
   __init__.py1322283%21, 25, 30, 38, 70, 117–118, 128, 130–131, 135, 139–140, 143, 154–155, 159, 180, 209, 211, 229, 232
   config.py26260%4, 6, 9–17, 19–21, 23–26, 28–30, 32–35, 37
   user_login.py31310%1–4, 7–9, 13–15, 17–18, 20–21, 23–25, 27–29, 31–34, 36–41, 43
www/beam
   __init__.py14140%4–7, 10–19
   index.py770%4, 6, 9–13
TOTAL116142563% 

@agritheory
Copy link
Owner

@lauty95 Questions about your demo: It looks like scanning at item clears the table, after you've scanned the WH. I don't think that's right, it should add_or_increment instead. Have you tested this with a handling unit?

@lauty95
Copy link
Collaborator Author

lauty95 commented Feb 28, 2025

@agritheory
1 - Yes! It clears the table. I'll update it.
2 - Mmm I haven't tested this with a handling unit. I'll check it out

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Renovate Stock Reconciliation form view workflows
2 participants