We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I added a transformation on the treeless syntax that makes all cases exhaustive, even when the branches are unreachable.
However, what used to be the "default" return value for the case is bound in a let binding prior to the match.
let
Is this problematic?
What is the whcbv semantics for let bindings? If we bind a box in a let binding, will it fail before we reach the case?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
I added a transformation on the treeless syntax that makes all cases exhaustive, even when the branches are unreachable.
However, what used to be the "default" return value for the case is bound in a
let
binding prior to the match.Is this problematic?
What is the whcbv semantics for let bindings? If we bind a box in a let binding, will it fail before we reach the case?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: