Skip to content

Investigate case semantics #11

Open
@flupe

Description

@flupe

I added a transformation on the treeless syntax that makes all cases exhaustive, even when the branches are unreachable.

However, what used to be the "default" return value for the case is bound in a let binding prior to the match.

Is this problematic?

What is the whcbv semantics for let bindings? If we bind a box in a let binding, will it fail before we reach the case?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    questionFurther information is requested

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions