You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I would like Kaffy admin to add support for CKEditor super build, which comes with a full fledged richtext editor, like this:
I had to create a custom EctoRichTextField, add CKEditor super build CDN to Kaffy , followed this guide Running a full-featured editor from CDN and loaded the plugins config script shown in the above guide as custom javascripts, rendering the editor you see in the screenshot.
I can't load CKEditor super build under Kaffy's custom javascripts because it causes conflicts.
So my thought is since Kaffy ships with the minimal CKEditor javascript which adds support for richtext fields, it would be nice if there is an option to configure which version of CKEditor to use, or perhaps Kaffy ships with the CKEditor super build by default and allow developers to load a custom javascripts describing which plugins or widgets should appear on the editor
Would love to hear your thoughts.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I would like
Kaffy
admin to add support forCKEditor
super build, which comes with a full fledgedrichtext
editor, like this:I had to create a custom
Ecto
RichTextField
, addCKEditor
super build CDN toKaffy
, followed this guide Running a full-featured editor from CDN and loaded the plugins config script shown in the above guide as customjavascripts
, rendering the editor you see in the screenshot.I can't load
CKEditor
super build underKaffy's
customjavascripts
because it causes conflicts.So my thought is since
Kaffy
ships with the minimal CKEditor javascript which adds support forrichtext
fields, it would be nice if there is an option to configure which version ofCKEditor
to use, or perhapsKaffy
ships with theCKEditor
super build by default and allow developers to load a custom javascripts describing which plugins or widgets should appear on the editorWould love to hear your thoughts.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: