Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dynamic parallel via TEST_TIME issue #5621

Open
llxia opened this issue Sep 18, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Dynamic parallel via TEST_TIME issue #5621

llxia opened this issue Sep 18, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@llxia
Copy link
Contributor

llxia commented Sep 18, 2024

When using dynamic parallel via TEST_TIME, there is a chance that we do not get the actual test execution time. This could result in default test execution being used (2 secs per test). In the following example, extended.jck is expected to be complete in 01m56s on one machine.

00:05:04.866  TEST DURATION
00:05:04.866  ====================================================================================
00:05:04.866  Total number of tests searched: 94
00:05:04.866  Number of test durations found: 94
00:05:04.866  Top slowest tests: 
00:05:04.866  	00m02s jck-compiler-lang-CLSS-Group9_0
00:05:04.866  	00m02s jck-compiler-lang-ANNOT_0
00:05:04.866  	00m02s jck-runtime-lang-EXEC_0
00:05:04.866  ====================================================================================
00:05:04.866  
00:05:04.866  Test target is split into 1 lists.
00:05:04.866  Reducing estimated test running time from 01m56s to 01m56s.
00:05:04.866  
00:05:04.866  -------------------------------------testList_0-------------------------------------
00:05:04.866  Number of tests: 94
00:05:04.866  Estimated running time: 01m56s

link

This may be due to network issues. While we are investigating this, we should set the default minimal NUM_MACHINES for certain long-running test builds when dynamic parallel via TEST_TIME is used.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Todo
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant