Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Connecting over HTTP broken (The issue formerly known as: Connecting with IP & Port nodes) #5

Open
Getty4170 opened this issue Nov 17, 2020 · 3 comments

Comments

@Getty4170
Copy link

Etherflow doesn't accept connections when including a port. For example http://172.16.254.1:8545/

Since many nodes are used in this format, it would be great if EtherFlow supported it.

@abunsen
Copy link
Owner

abunsen commented Nov 20, 2020

@Getty4170 appreciate this submission! Will tag you in the PR.

@abunsen
Copy link
Owner

abunsen commented Nov 20, 2020

Just looked at this more, it looks like it's actually mixed content error and we are actually sending to the port:
Screen Shot 2020-11-20 at 9 28 58 AM

@abunsen abunsen changed the title Connecting with IP & Port nodes Connecting over HTTP broken (The issue formerly known as: Connecting with IP & Port nodes) Nov 20, 2020
@ashutoshpw
Copy link

If anyone else is facing the mix-content error, then there are 2 ways by which you could solve this issue.

  1. Use a local version of etherflow by deploying the repository on your local computer.
  2. Use services like ngrok.io or Cloudflare Tunnel to get a kind of HTTPS proxy for your HTTP nodes.

The second option here is easier to set up and could be quickly implemented.

Cause of this issue

  • On a HTTPS website, you cannot make calls to HTTP endpoints

Why would the above options work?

  • In 1st option, you are taking off the etherflow from HTTPS to HTTP version
  • In 2nd option, you are moving in the Blockchain Node from HTTP to HTTPS version

@github-staff github-staff deleted a comment from JK-0 Apr 3, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants