Mock implementation of the public API for example app #34
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant changes to the AblyChatExample project, including the addition of new Swift source files and a Swift package dependency. The chat functionality has been enhanced by replacing the existing chat client with a mock implementation for testing purposes. Several asynchronous functions have been introduced to manage real-time updates for messages, reactions, presence, and typing notifications. Additionally, modifications have been made to various protocols to support asynchronous operations, improving the overall interaction model within the chat application. Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Was there anything specific you wanted feedback on, @maratal? I think the main thing that needs doing is to make sure that the user’s actions get emitted by the SDK.
maratal
force-pushed
the
4-api-mocks
branch
2 times, most recently
from
cb4581a
to
9e771bc
Compare
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (18)
Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/Misc.swift (2)
4-36: LGTM!The
MockMessagesPaginatedResultclass provides a basic mock implementation for testing message retrieval. However, consider the following suggestions to enhance the mock implementation:
- Implement the missing properties of the
PaginatedResultprotocol (hasNext,isLast,next,first,current) to provide a more comprehensive mock implementation.- Consider generating multiple mock
Messageobjects to simulate a more realistic scenario with multiple messages.Tools
SwiftLint
[Error] 12-12: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 18-18: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 18-18: Multi-line collection literals should have trailing commas
(trailing_comma)
[Error] 6-6: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 9-9: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 21-21: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 13-13: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
[Error] 14-14: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
[Error] 15-15: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
[Error] 16-16: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
[Error] 17-17: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
[Error] 18-18: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
6-83: Fix minor formatting issues.Consider fixing the following minor formatting issues to improve code consistency and readability:
- Remove trailing whitespace from empty lines.
- Remove the empty line after the opening brace of the
MockStringsclass and the extension onReaction.Tools
SwiftLint
[Error] 38-38: Types used for hosting only static members should be implemented as a caseless enum to avoid instantiation
(convenience_type)
[Error] 12-12: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 18-18: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 18-18: Multi-line collection literals should have trailing commas
(trailing_comma)
[Error] 6-6: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 9-9: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 21-21: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 39-39: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 41-41: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 50-50: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 63-63: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 83-83: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 13-13: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
[Error] 14-14: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
[Error] 15-15: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
[Error] 16-16: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
[Error] 17-17: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
[Error] 18-18: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
[Error] 39-39: Don't include vertical whitespace (empty line) after opening braces
(vertical_whitespace_opening_braces)
[Error] 83-83: Don't include vertical whitespace (empty line) after opening braces
(vertical_whitespace_opening_braces)
Example/AblyChatExample/ContentView.swift (1)
56-66: Consider removing the trailing closure for theButtonaction.The use of the trailing closure for the
Buttonaction is not recommended as it can make the code harder to read and understand, especially when there are multiple closures involved.Consider applying this diff to remove the trailing closure and use a separate function instead:
- Button(action: { - if newMessage.isEmpty { - Task { - try await sendReaction(type: ReactionType.like.rawValue) - } - } else { - Task { - try await sendMessage() - } - } - }) { + Button(action: sendMessageOrReaction) { #if os(iOS) Text(sendTitle) .foregroundColor(.white) @@ - } + } + + private func sendMessageOrReaction() { + if newMessage.isEmpty { + Task { + try await sendReaction(type: ReactionType.like.rawValue) + } + } else { + Task { + try await sendMessage() + } + } + }Tools
SwiftLint
[Error] 66-66: Trailing closure syntax should not be used when passing more than one closure argument
(multiple_closures_with_trailing_closure)
Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/Mocks.swift (15)
4-22: LGTM!The
MockChatClientprovides a good starting point for testing the chat functionality. Consider completing the implementation of theconnectionandclientIDproperties as a future enhancement.Tools
SwiftLint
[Error] 14-14: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
24-44: LGTM!The
MockRoomsprovides a good starting point for testing the chat room functionality. Consider completing the implementation of thereleasemethod as a future enhancement.Tools
SwiftLint
[Error] 27-27: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 36-36: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 40-40: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
46-76: LGTM!The
MockRoomprovides a good starting point for testing the chat room functionality. Consider completing the implementation of theattachanddetachmethods as a future enhancement.Tools
SwiftLint
[Error] 48-48: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 51-51: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 56-56: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 68-68: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
78-132: LGTM!The
MockMessagesprovides a good simulation of receiving messages. Consider completing the implementation of thesubscribeToDiscontinuitiesmethod as a future enhancement.Tools
SwiftLint
[Error] 93-93: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 99-99: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 118-118: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 124-124: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 115-115: Use shorthand syntax for optional binding
(shorthand_optional_binding)
[Error] 82-82: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 84-84: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 90-90: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 102-102: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 109-109: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 113-113: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 128-128: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
104-104: Reminder: Address the TODO comment.The TODO comment indicates an issue with the
subscribemethod. Please ensure that the issue is resolved to maintain the correctness of the mock implementation.Do you want me to open a GitHub issue to track this task?
93-99: Fix the formatting issues.The static analysis tool has identified the following formatting issues:
- Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line.
- Lines should not have trailing whitespace.
Please fix these issues to adhere to the coding style guidelines.
Also applies to: 118-124
Tools
SwiftLint
[Error] 93-93: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 99-99: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
134-179: LGTM!The
MockRoomReactionsprovides a good simulation of receiving reactions. Consider completing the implementation of thesubscribeToDiscontinuitiesmethod as a future enhancement.Tools
SwiftLint
[Error] 149-149: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 154-154: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 162-162: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 167-167: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 159-159: Use shorthand syntax for optional binding
(shorthand_optional_binding)
[Error] 138-138: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 140-140: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 146-146: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 157-157: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 170-170: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 175-175: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 163-163: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
[Error] 164-164: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
[Error] 165-165: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
[Error] 166-166: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
[Error] 167-167: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
149-154: Fix the formatting issues.The static analysis tool has identified the following formatting issues:
- Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line.
- Lines should not have trailing whitespace.
- Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call.
Please fix these issues to adhere to the coding style guidelines.
Also applies to: 162-167
Tools
SwiftLint
[Error] 149-149: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 154-154: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
181-229: LGTM!The
MockTypingprovides a good simulation of receiving typing events. Consider completing the implementation of thesubscribeToDiscontinuitiesmethod as a future enhancement.Tools
SwiftLint
[Error] 213-213: Use shorthand syntax for optional binding
(shorthand_optional_binding)
[Error] 220-220: Use shorthand syntax for optional binding
(shorthand_optional_binding)
[Error] 198-198: Multi-line collection literals should have trailing commas
(trailing_comma)
[Error] 185-185: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 187-187: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 193-193: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 202-202: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 207-207: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 211-211: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 218-218: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 225-225: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
198-198: Fix the formatting issues.The static analysis tool has identified the following formatting issues:
- Multi-line collection literals should have trailing commas.
- Lines should not have trailing whitespace.
- Use shorthand syntax for optional binding.
Please fix these issues to adhere to the coding style guidelines.
Also applies to: 213-213, 220-220
Tools
SwiftLint
[Error] 198-198: Multi-line collection literals should have trailing commas
(trailing_comma)
231-336: LGTM!The
MockPresenceprovides a good simulation of receiving presence events. Consider completing the implementation of theisUserPresent,update, andsubscribeToDiscontinuitiesmethods as future enhancements.Tools
SwiftLint
[Error] 244-244: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 247-247: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 253-253: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 257-257: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 263-263: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 267-267: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 279-279: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 282-282: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 289-289: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 292-292: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 307-307: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 310-310: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 317-317: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 320-320: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 276-276: Use shorthand syntax for optional binding
(shorthand_optional_binding)
[Error] 286-286: Use shorthand syntax for optional binding
(shorthand_optional_binding)
[Error] 304-304: Use shorthand syntax for optional binding
(shorthand_optional_binding)
[Error] 314-314: Use shorthand syntax for optional binding
(shorthand_optional_binding)
[Error] 234-234: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 236-236: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 241-241: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 250-250: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 260-260: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 270-270: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 274-274: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 284-284: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 294-294: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 298-298: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 302-302: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 312-312: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 322-322: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 327-327: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 332-332: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
244-247: Fix the formatting issues.The static analysis tool has identified the following formatting issues:
- Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line.
- Lines should not have trailing whitespace.
- Use shorthand syntax for optional binding.
Please fix these issues to adhere to the coding style guidelines.
Also applies to: 253-257, 263-267, 276-276, 286-286, 304-304, 314-314
Tools
SwiftLint
[Error] 244-244: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 247-247: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
338-370: LGTM!The
MockOccupancyprovides a good simulation of receiving occupancy events. Consider completing the implementation of thesubscribeToDiscontinuitiesmethod as a future enhancement.Tools
SwiftLint
[Error] 342-342: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 344-344: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 350-350: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 357-357: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 362-362: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 366-366: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
342-342: Fix the formatting issues.The static analysis tool has identified the following formatting issue:
- Lines should not have trailing whitespace.
Please fix this issue to adhere to the coding style guidelines.
Also applies to: 344-344, 350-350, 357-357, 362-362, 366-366
Tools
SwiftLint
[Error] 342-342: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
375-375: Fix the formatting issues.The static analysis tool has identified the following formatting issue:
- Lines should not have trailing whitespace.
Please fix this issue to adhere to the coding style guidelines.
Also applies to: 378-378, 380-380, 386-386, 392-392
Tools
SwiftLint
[Error] 375-375: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (12)
- Example/AblyChatExample.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj (8 hunks)
- Example/AblyChatExample/ContentView.swift (1 hunks)
- Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/Misc.swift (1 hunks)
- Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/MockSubscriptions.swift (1 hunks)
- Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/Mocks.swift (1 hunks)
- Sources/AblyChat/AblyCocoaExtensions/Ably+Dependencies.swift (1 hunks)
- Sources/AblyChat/EmitsDiscontinuities.swift (1 hunks)
- Sources/AblyChat/Messages.swift (1 hunks)
- Sources/AblyChat/Occupancy.swift (1 hunks)
- Sources/AblyChat/Presence.swift (1 hunks)
- Sources/AblyChat/RoomReactions.swift (1 hunks)
- Sources/AblyChat/Typing.swift (1 hunks)
Additional context used
SwiftLint
Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/MockSubscriptions.swift
[Error] 10-10: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 13-13: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 17-17: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 21-21: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/Misc.swift
[Error] 38-38: Types used for hosting only static members should be implemented as a caseless enum to avoid instantiation
(convenience_type)
[Error] 12-12: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 18-18: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 18-18: Multi-line collection literals should have trailing commas
(trailing_comma)
[Error] 6-6: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 9-9: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 21-21: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 39-39: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 41-41: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 50-50: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 63-63: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 83-83: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 13-13: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
[Error] 14-14: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
[Error] 15-15: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
[Error] 16-16: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
[Error] 17-17: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
[Error] 18-18: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
[Error] 39-39: Don't include vertical whitespace (empty line) after opening braces
(vertical_whitespace_opening_braces)
[Error] 83-83: Don't include vertical whitespace (empty line) after opening braces
(vertical_whitespace_opening_braces)
Example/AblyChatExample/ContentView.swift
[Error] 169-169: Conditional statements should always return on the next line
(conditional_returns_on_newline)
[Error] 21-21: Force tries should be avoided
(force_try)
[Error] 209-209: Prefer implicit returns in closures, functions and getters
(implicit_return)
[Error] 66-66: Trailing closure syntax should not be used when passing more than one closure argument
(multiple_closures_with_trailing_closure)
[Error] 170-170: Prefer
_ = foo()overlet _ = foo()when discarding a result from a function(redundant_discardable_let)
[Error] 6-6: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 11-11: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 23-23: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 27-27: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 55-55: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 97-97: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 101-101: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 109-109: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 117-117: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 125-125: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 139-139: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 147-147: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 167-167: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 173-173: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 187-187: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 220-220: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 6-6: Don't include vertical whitespace (empty line) after opening braces
(vertical_whitespace_opening_braces)
[Error] 220-220: Don't include vertical whitespace (empty line) after opening braces
(vertical_whitespace_opening_braces)
Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/Mocks.swift
[Error] 93-93: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 99-99: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 118-118: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 124-124: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 149-149: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 154-154: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 162-162: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 167-167: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 244-244: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 247-247: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 253-253: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 257-257: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 263-263: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 267-267: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 279-279: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 282-282: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 289-289: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 292-292: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 307-307: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 310-310: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 317-317: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 320-320: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 115-115: Use shorthand syntax for optional binding
(shorthand_optional_binding)
[Error] 159-159: Use shorthand syntax for optional binding
(shorthand_optional_binding)
[Error] 213-213: Use shorthand syntax for optional binding
(shorthand_optional_binding)
[Error] 220-220: Use shorthand syntax for optional binding
(shorthand_optional_binding)
[Error] 276-276: Use shorthand syntax for optional binding
(shorthand_optional_binding)
[Error] 286-286: Use shorthand syntax for optional binding
(shorthand_optional_binding)
[Error] 304-304: Use shorthand syntax for optional binding
(shorthand_optional_binding)
[Error] 314-314: Use shorthand syntax for optional binding
(shorthand_optional_binding)
[Error] 198-198: Multi-line collection literals should have trailing commas
(trailing_comma)
[Error] 14-14: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 27-27: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 36-36: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 40-40: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 48-48: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 51-51: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 56-56: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 68-68: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 82-82: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 84-84: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 90-90: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 102-102: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 109-109: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 113-113: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 128-128: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 138-138: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 140-140: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 146-146: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 157-157: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 170-170: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 175-175: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 185-185: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 187-187: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 193-193: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 202-202: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 207-207: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 211-211: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 218-218: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 225-225: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 234-234: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 236-236: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 241-241: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 250-250: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 260-260: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 270-270: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 274-274: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 284-284: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 294-294: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 298-298: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 302-302: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 312-312: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 322-322: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 327-327: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 332-332: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 342-342: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 344-344: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 350-350: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 357-357: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 362-362: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 366-366: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 375-375: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 378-378: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 380-380: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 386-386: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 392-392: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 163-163: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
[Error] 164-164: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
[Error] 165-165: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
[Error] 166-166: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
[Error] 167-167: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
Additional comments not posted (29)
Sources/AblyChat/EmitsDiscontinuities.swift (1)
4-4: Approve the change to make the method asynchronous.The change from a synchronous to an asynchronous function for
subscribeToDiscontinuitiesis a significant improvement. It allows for non-blocking calls and better handling of asynchronous operations.As mentioned in the past review comment, please ensure that the commit message explains this change to the public API. Clients of the
EmitsDiscontinuitiesprotocol will need to update their code to handle the asynchronous nature of the method call.Sources/AblyChat/Typing.swift (2)
4-4: Approve the change to asynchronous operation.The change from synchronous to asynchronous operation for the
subscribemethod is a good improvement. It allows for non-blocking calls and can enhance the responsiveness of the application.However, ensure that the implementation of the
Typingprotocol and its conforming types are updated accordingly to handle the asynchronous behavior. Also, verify that any existing code relying on the synchronous behavior is adapted to work with the asynchronous nature of the method.Run the following script to verify the usage of the
subscribemethod:Verification successful
Asynchronous
subscribemethod implemented correctly and consistently.The change to make the
subscribemethod asynchronous has been successfully implemented across the codebase. Key observations:
- The method signature is consistent in all relevant files.
- Example usage in
ContentView.swiftcorrectly usesawaitwhen calling the method.- Mock implementations have been updated to match the new asynchronous signature.
No further action is required regarding this change.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `subscribe` method in the codebase. # Test: Search for the method usage. Expect: Occurrences of the asynchronous usage. rg --type swift -A 5 $'subscribe\(bufferingPolicy:'Length of output: 8140
8-8: Approve the change in the return type of thechannelproperty.The change in the return type of the
channelproperty fromARTRealtimeChannelProtocoltoRealtimeChannelseems to be a refinement in the type system. It may provide a more specific and streamlined interface for interacting with the channel.However, verify that this change does not break any existing code that relies on the previous protocol. Ensure that
RealtimeChannelprovides the necessary functionality and is compatible with the rest of the codebase.Run the following script to verify the usage of the
channelproperty:Verification successful
Confirm the consistent application of the
RealtimeChanneltype across the codebaseThe change from
ARTRealtimeChannelProtocoltoRealtimeChannelhas been consistently implemented throughout the codebase. This includes:
- Core functionality in
Sources/AblyChat/(RoomReactions, Typing, Messages, Occupancy)- Example and mock implementations in
Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/The uniform application of this change suggests a comprehensive update to the type system. No inconsistencies or issues were found during the verification process.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `channel` property in the codebase. # Test: Search for the property usage. Expect: Occurrences of the new return type. rg --type swift -A 5 $'channel\s*:\s*RealtimeChannel'Length of output: 3213
Sources/AblyChat/Occupancy.swift (2)
4-4: Approve the change to make thesubscribefunction asynchronous.The change aligns with modern Swift concurrency practices and can improve responsiveness in concurrent environments.
Please ensure that all callers of this function are updated to handle the asynchronous nature properly, using
awaitwhen calling this function.Run the following script to verify the usage of the
subscribefunction:Verification successful
Verification successful:
subscribefunction is correctly implemented as async and used with await.The codebase analysis shows that:
- The
subscribefunction is correctly defined asasyncin relevant protocol definitions.- All actual usages of the
subscribefunction inExample/AblyChatExample/ContentView.swiftcorrectly useawait.No issues were found with the implementation or usage of the asynchronous
subscribefunction.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all callers of the `subscribe` function are updated to use `await`. # Test: Search for the function usage. Expect: All occurrences to use `await`. rg --type swift -A 5 $'subscribe\(bufferingPolicy:'Length of output: 8140
6-6: Approve the change to update the return type of thechannelproperty.The change may reflect a refinement in the type system or a change in the underlying implementation.
Please ensure that all code that interacts with this property is updated to handle the new
RealtimeChanneltype.Run the following script to verify the usage of the
channelproperty:Verification successful
Approve the change to update the return type of the
channelproperty toRealtimeChannel.The change from
ARTRealtimeChannelProtocoltoRealtimeChannelhas been implemented consistently throughout the codebase. Here's a summary of the findings:
RealtimeChannelis defined as a typealias forany(ARTRealtimeChannelProtocol & Sendable), which explains the type change and adds theSendablerequirement.- A custom
RealtimeChannelProtocolis defined that conforms to bothARTRealtimeChannelProtocolandSendable, likely as an intermediary step for compatibility.- The remaining uses of
ARTRealtimeChannelProtocolare part of these type definitions and an internal extension, which is consistent with the change.The update improves type safety by ensuring
Sendableconformance while maintaining compatibility with the existingARTRealtimeChannelProtocol. No further actions are required.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all code that interacts with the `channel` property is updated to handle the new type. # Test: Search for the property usage. Expect: All occurrences to handle the `RealtimeChannel` type. rg --type swift -A 5 $'\\bchannel\\b'Length of output: 10853
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining occurrences of ARTRealtimeChannelProtocol rg --type swift 'ARTRealtimeChannelProtocol'Length of output: 379
Sources/AblyChat/RoomReactions.swift (2)
5-5: LGTM!The change to make the
subscribemethod asynchronous is a valid improvement. It allows for better handling of network calls or other time-consuming tasks.The past review comments have been addressed by making the method asynchronous and allowing the
mockAsyncSequenceto emit events.
6-6: Verify the impact of the type change on the codebase.The type of the
channelproperty has been changed fromARTRealtimeChannelProtocoltoRealtimeChannel. This change suggests a shift in the underlying implementation or abstraction of the channel.Please ensure that this type change does not break any existing code that uses the
channelproperty.Run the following script to verify the usage of the
channelproperty:Verification successful
To gather more information and ensure a comprehensive analysis, let's run additional scripts to verify our findings.
Verified: The channel type change is a refinement, not a replacement
The change from
ARTRealtimeChannelProtocoltoRealtimeChannelis actually a refinement rather than a complete replacement. Here's what we found:
RealtimeChannelis defined as a typealias:public typealias RealtimeChannel = any(ARTRealtimeChannelProtocol & Sendable)- There's a
RealtimeChannelProtocolthat extendsARTRealtimeChannelProtocoland addsSendableconformance- The original
ARTRealtimeChannelProtocolis still used and extended in the codebaseThis change ensures type safety and sendability while maintaining compatibility with the existing
ARTRealtimeChannelProtocol. The refinement explains why no breaking changes were observed in the codebase.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the `channel` property in the codebase. # Test: Search for the usage of the `channel` property. Expect: No type mismatch errors. rg --type swift $'channel\s*\.\s*' -A 5Length of output: 1847
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Further verify the impact of changing channel type from ARTRealtimeChannelProtocol to RealtimeChannel # Check the definition of RealtimeChannel echo "Checking RealtimeChannel definition:" ast-grep --lang swift --pattern 'class RealtimeChannel { $$$ }' # Look for any remaining usage of ARTRealtimeChannelProtocol echo "Searching for ARTRealtimeChannelProtocol usage:" rg --type swift "ARTRealtimeChannelProtocol" # Double-check for any other usages of the channel property echo "Searching for additional channel property usages:" rg --type swift "\.channel\b" -A 2Length of output: 1976
Sources/AblyChat/AblyCocoaExtensions/Ably+Dependencies.swift (2)
12-13: Approve the change but track the related issue.The addition of the
@retroactive @unchecked Sendableconformance forARTRealtimePresenceQueryenhances the concurrency safety of the class. The use of@retroactiveattribute is appropriate to silence the Swift 6 compiler warning.However, the use of
@uncheckedattribute bypasses the compiler's sendable checking, which may introduce potential concurrency issues if not properly addressed in the future.Please ensure that the related issue in the Ably library (ably/ably-cocoa#1962) is tracked and resolved to properly implement the
Sendableconformance without relying on the@uncheckedattribute.
20-21: Approve the change but track the related issue.The addition of the
@unchecked Sendableconformance forARTRealtimePresenceQueryin the#elsebranch ensures consistent behavior across different Swift versions.However, similar to the previous comment, the use of
@uncheckedattribute bypasses the compiler's sendable checking, which may introduce potential concurrency issues if not properly addressed in the future.Please refer to the previous comment regarding tracking the related issue in the Ably library (ably/ably-cocoa#1962) to properly implement the
Sendableconformance without relying on the@uncheckedattribute.Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/MockSubscriptions.swift (1)
1-30: LGTM!The
MockSubscriptionstruct provides a flexible and reusable mock implementation for asynchronous sequences. The use ofAsyncStreamandAsyncTimerSequencealigns with the suggestions from the past review comments, making the code more readable and maintainable.It's great to see the collaborative effort in incorporating the feedback and keeping the mock implementation long-term for testing and demonstration purposes.
Tools
SwiftLint
[Error] 10-10: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 13-13: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 17-17: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 21-21: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
Sources/AblyChat/Presence.swift (2)
16-16: LGTM! Remember to update existing implementations.The change to make the
subscribe(event:)method asynchronous is a good enhancement to support asynchronous programming patterns.However, this is a breaking change for any existing implementations of the
Presenceprotocol. Ensure that all current implementations are updated to handle the asynchronous method signature.
17-17: LGTM! Similar to the previous comment.The change to make the
subscribe(events:)method asynchronous is consistent with the previous code segment and is a good enhancement to support asynchronous programming patterns.As mentioned in the previous comment, ensure that all current implementations of the
Presenceprotocol are updated to handle the asynchronous method signature, as this is a breaking change.Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/Misc.swift (1)
61-87: LGTM!The
ReactionTypeenum and the extension onReactionprovide a clear and convenient way to represent and display different types of reactions with their associated emoji. The code is well-structured and enhances the functionality of theReactiontype.Tools
SwiftLint
[Error] 63-63: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 83-83: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 83-83: Don't include vertical whitespace (empty line) after opening braces
(vertical_whitespace_opening_braces)
Sources/AblyChat/Messages.swift (4)
3-3: LGTM!The new
RealtimeChanneltype alias provides flexibility by allowing any type that conforms to bothARTRealtimeChannelProtocolandSendableto be used. TheSendableconformance ensures safe usage across concurrency domains.
6-6: LGTM!The change to make the
subscribemethod asynchronous is a good improvement. It allows for better handling of concurrent operations and can potentially improve the responsiveness of the application.
Line range hint
11-116: Skipping the review of unchanged code segments.The remaining code segments in the file do not have any changes. Therefore, no further review is required for those segments.
9-9: Verify the usage of thechannelproperty in the codebase.The change to use the
RealtimeChanneltype alias for thechannelproperty aligns with the introduction of the new type alias. However, it's important to ensure that all instances assigned to thechannelproperty conform to bothARTRealtimeChannelProtocolandSendable.Run the following script to verify the usage of the
channelproperty:Verification successful
To further verify the conformance of the assigned types to the required protocols, we need to examine the implementation of
MockRealtime.ChannelandMockChannels. Let's run additional scripts to gather this information.
To complete our verification, we need to investigate the MockRealtimeChannel implementation, as it appears to be the actual mock used for channels. Let's run additional scripts to gather this information.
To complete our verification, we need to investigate the RealtimeChannelProtocol to ensure it includes both ARTRealtimeChannelProtocol and Sendable. Let's run an additional script to gather this information.
The change to use
RealtimeChannelin theMessagesprotocol is verified and consistent with the codebase.The investigation confirms that:
RealtimeChannelProtocolis defined to conform to bothARTRealtimeChannelProtocolandSendable.- The mock implementation
MockRealtimeChannelconforms toRealtimeChannelProtocol, ensuring it meets the required protocol conformances.This change aligns with the codebase structure and maintains the necessary protocol conformances. The usage of
RealtimeChannelin theMessagesprotocol is appropriate and doesn't introduce any inconsistencies.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify that all instances assigned to the `channel` property conform to the required protocols. # Test: Search for assignments to the `channel` property. rg --type swift $'channel\s*=\s*' -A 5 # Expect: All assigned instances should conform to `ARTRealtimeChannelProtocol` and `Sendable`.Length of output: 2424
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the implementation of MockRealtime.Channel and MockChannels # Search for the definition of MockRealtime.Channel echo "=== MockRealtime.Channel Definition ===" rg --type swift "class\s+MockRealtime\.Channel" -A 10 # Search for the implementation of MockChannels echo "=== MockChannels Implementation ===" rg --type swift "class\s+MockChannels" -A 20 # Search for protocol conformance of MockRealtime.Channel echo "=== MockRealtime.Channel Protocol Conformance ===" rg --type swift "MockRealtime\.Channel\s*:\s*" -A 5Length of output: 1994
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the implementation and conformance of MockRealtimeChannel # Search for the definition of MockRealtimeChannel echo "=== MockRealtimeChannel Definition ===" rg --type swift "class\s+MockRealtimeChannel" -A 10 # Search for protocol conformance of MockRealtimeChannel echo "=== MockRealtimeChannel Protocol Conformance ===" rg --type swift "MockRealtimeChannel\s*:\s*" -A 5 # Search for any other mock channel implementations echo "=== Other Mock Channel Implementations ===" rg --type swift "class\s+.*Channel.*:\s*(ARTRealtimeChannelProtocol|Sendable)" -A 5Length of output: 1907
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check the definition of RealtimeChannelProtocol # Search for the definition of RealtimeChannelProtocol echo "=== RealtimeChannelProtocol Definition ===" rg --type swift "protocol\s+RealtimeChannelProtocol" -A 10 # Search for any typealias of RealtimeChannelProtocol echo "=== RealtimeChannelProtocol Typealias ===" rg --type swift "typealias\s+RealtimeChannelProtocol" -A 5Length of output: 426
Example/AblyChatExample/ContentView.swift (6)
4-4: LGTM!The use of
@MainActorfor theContentViewstruct is appropriate as it ensures that all asynchronous operations are performed on the main thread, which is required for updating the UI.
12-18: LGTM!The addition of these
@Stateproperties is a major change that enhances the chat functionality by allowing the view to store and update the state of various aspects of the chat interface. The properties are named appropriately and their initial values are set correctly.
24-26: LGTM!The addition of this property is a minor change that provides a convenient way to determine the title of the send button based on whether the user is sending a message or a reaction. The use of the ternary operator is appropriate in this case as it provides a concise way to determine the value of the property based on a simple condition. The property is named appropriately and its logic is easy to understand.
30-95: LGTM!The restructuring of the
bodyis a significant change that provides a more comprehensive and user-friendly chat interface. The use of theMessageBasicViewstruct and the.taskmodifiers are good ways to keep the code clean, readable, and performant.Tools
SwiftLint
[Error] 66-66: Trailing closure syntax should not be used when passing more than one closure argument
(multiple_closures_with_trailing_closure)
[Error] 55-55: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
98-100: LGTM!The addition of this function is a minor change that provides a convenient way to set the default title of the chat view to the ID of the chat room. The function is named appropriately and its logic is easy to understand.
7-10: Verify the impact of the change fromDefaultChatClienttoMockChatClienton the codebase.The change from
DefaultChatClienttoMockChatClientis significant and should be reviewed carefully to ensure that the mock implementation behaves as expected and does not introduce any regressions or inconsistencies in the codebase.Run the following script to verify the usage of
DefaultChatClientandMockChatClientin the codebase:Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/Mocks.swift (1)
372-397: LGTM!The
MockRoomStatusprovides a good simulation of receiving room status changes.Tools
SwiftLint
[Error] 375-375: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 378-378: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 380-380: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 386-386: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 392-392: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
Example/AblyChatExample.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj (5)
16-18: LGTM!The addition of the new Swift source files
Misc.swift,Mocks.swift, andMockSubscriptions.swiftlooks good. The file names align with the PR objective of creating a mock implementation of the public API.
19-19: Provide more context on the usage ofAsyncAlgorithms.The addition of the
AsyncAlgorithmsframework dependency looks fine. However, it would be helpful to provide more context on how this framework is being utilized in the project. Could you please elaborate on the specific use cases or requirements that led to the inclusion of this dependency?
31-33: LGTM!The addition of file references for
Misc.swift,Mocks.swift, andMockSubscriptions.swiftin the project looks good. The references are placed in the appropriate sections and are consistent with the addition of the new source files.Also applies to: 53-55
124-124: LGTM!The addition of the
AsyncAlgorithmspackage product dependency and remote Swift package reference looks good. The changes are consistent with the addition of theAsyncAlgorithmsframework dependency, and the package reference specifies the necessary repository URL and version requirements.Also applies to: 154-156
186-188: LGTM!The addition of the new Swift source files
Misc.swift,Mocks.swift, andMockSubscriptions.swiftto the build phase of the project looks good. This ensures that the new files are properly compiled and linked with the project.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
Example/AblyChatExample/ContentView.swift (1)
191-195: Remove the redundantlet _assignment.The assignment of the result of the
send()method to alet _constant is redundant and can be removed.Apply this diff to remove the redundant assignment:
- let _ = try await room().messages.send(params: .init(text: newMessage)) + try await room().messages.send(params: .init(text: newMessage))Tools
SwiftLint
[Error] 192-192: Conditional statements should always return on the next line
(conditional_returns_on_newline)
[Error] 193-193: Prefer
_ = foo()overlet _ = foo()when discarding a result from a function(redundant_discardable_let)
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- Example/AblyChatExample/ContentView.swift (1 hunks)
- Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/MockSubscriptions.swift (1 hunks)
- Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/Mocks.swift (1 hunks)
Additional context used
SwiftLint
Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/MockSubscriptions.swift
[Error] 10-10: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 13-13: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 17-17: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 21-21: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
Example/AblyChatExample/ContentView.swift
[Error] 192-192: Conditional statements should always return on the next line
(conditional_returns_on_newline)
[Error] 29-29: Force tries should be avoided
(force_try)
[Error] 293-293: Prefer implicit returns in closures, functions and getters
(implicit_return)
[Error] 71-71: Trailing closure syntax should not be used when passing more than one closure argument
(multiple_closures_with_trailing_closure)
[Error] 193-193: Prefer
_ = foo()overlet _ = foo()when discarding a result from a function(redundant_discardable_let)
[Error] 19-19: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 31-31: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 35-35: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 120-120: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 124-124: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 132-132: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 140-140: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 148-148: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 162-162: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 170-170: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 190-190: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 196-196: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 203-203: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 215-215: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 219-219: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 222-222: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 271-271: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 304-304: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 6-6: Don't include vertical whitespace (empty line) after opening braces
(vertical_whitespace_opening_braces)
[Error] 203-203: Don't include vertical whitespace (empty line) after opening braces
(vertical_whitespace_opening_braces)
[Error] 304-304: Don't include vertical whitespace (empty line) after opening braces
(vertical_whitespace_opening_braces)
Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/Mocks.swift
[Error] 93-93: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 99-99: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 118-118: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 124-124: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 149-149: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 154-154: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 162-162: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 167-167: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 244-244: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 247-247: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 253-253: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 257-257: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 263-263: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 267-267: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 279-279: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 282-282: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 289-289: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 292-292: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 307-307: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 310-310: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 317-317: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 320-320: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 115-115: Use shorthand syntax for optional binding
(shorthand_optional_binding)
[Error] 159-159: Use shorthand syntax for optional binding
(shorthand_optional_binding)
[Error] 213-213: Use shorthand syntax for optional binding
(shorthand_optional_binding)
[Error] 220-220: Use shorthand syntax for optional binding
(shorthand_optional_binding)
[Error] 276-276: Use shorthand syntax for optional binding
(shorthand_optional_binding)
[Error] 286-286: Use shorthand syntax for optional binding
(shorthand_optional_binding)
[Error] 304-304: Use shorthand syntax for optional binding
(shorthand_optional_binding)
[Error] 314-314: Use shorthand syntax for optional binding
(shorthand_optional_binding)
[Error] 198-198: Multi-line collection literals should have trailing commas
(trailing_comma)
[Error] 163-163: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
[Error] 164-164: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
[Error] 165-165: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
[Error] 166-166: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
[Error] 167-167: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
Additional comments not posted (15)
Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/MockSubscriptions.swift (1)
5-30: LGTM!The
MockSubscriptionstruct is well-implemented and correctly conforms to theAsyncSequenceprotocol. The use ofAsyncStreamandAsyncTimerSequenceis appropriate for generating and merging elements asynchronously. Theemitmethod provides a convenient way to yield elements externally, and themakeAsyncIteratormethod correctly returns an iterator for the merged sequence.The struct's design facilitates testing and simulating asynchronous behavior in the Ably and AblyChat frameworks.
Tools
SwiftLint
[Error] 10-10: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 13-13: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 17-17: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 21-21: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
Example/AblyChatExample/ContentView.swift (5)
197-199: LGTM!The
sendReaction()function correctly sends the reaction to the chat room using the providedtypeparameter and handles the error that can be thrown by theroom()function usingtry.
204-214: LGTM!The
Reactionstruct correctly encapsulates the properties required for displaying and animating reactions and is used effectively in theshowReaction(),moveReactionUp(), andstartRotation()functions to manage the reactions.
292-296: LGTM!The
flip()function correctly applies the rotation and scale effects to create the flipping animation. The use of implicit return is a matter of personal preference and coding style.Tools
SwiftLint
[Error] 293-293: Prefer implicit returns in closures, functions and getters
(implicit_return)
28-30: Handle the error gracefully instead of usingtry!.The use of
try!is not recommended as it can cause the application to crash if theget(roomID:options:)function throws an error. Theroom()function should handle the error gracefully and provide appropriate feedback to the user.Consider applying this diff to handle the error gracefully:
- private func room() async -> Room { - try! await chatClient.rooms.get(roomID: "Demo", options: .init()) - } + private func room() async throws -> Room { + try await chatClient.rooms.get(roomID: "Demo", options: .init()) + }Then, update the callers of
room()to handle the error appropriately, e.g.:- func setDefaultTitle() async { - title = await "\(room().roomID)" - } + func setDefaultTitle() async { + do { + title = await "\(try room().roomID)" + } catch { + // Handle the error appropriately, e.g. show an error message to the user + print("Error getting room: \(error)") + } + }Tools
SwiftLint
[Error] 29-29: Force tries should be avoided
(force_try)
121-123: Handle the error that can be thrown by theroom()function.The
room()function can throw an error that is not being handled in thesetDefaultTitle()function. This can cause the application to crash if the error is not handled gracefully.Consider applying this diff to handle the error:
- func setDefaultTitle() async { - title = await "\(room().roomID)" - } + func setDefaultTitle() async { + do { + title = await "\(try room().roomID)" + } catch { + // Handle the error appropriately, e.g. show an error message to the user + print("Error getting room: \(error)") + } + }Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/Mocks.swift (9)
4-22: LGTM!The
MockChatClientactor provides a suitable mock implementation of theChatClientprotocol. The unimplemented properties are handled with fatal errors, which is acceptable for a mock.
24-44: LGTM!The
MockRoomsactor provides a suitable mock implementation of theRoomsprotocol. Thegetmethod handles room retrieval and creation correctly, and the unimplementedreleasemethod is handled with a fatal error, which is acceptable for a mock.
46-76: LGTM!The
MockRoomactor provides a suitable mock implementation of theRoomprotocol. The room-related entities are implemented as lazy properties, which is a good practice. The unimplemented methods are handled with fatal errors, which is acceptable for a mock.
78-132: LGTM!The
MockMessagesactor provides a suitable mock implementation of theMessagesprotocol. ThecreateSubscriptionmethod generates random messages at a fixed interval, which is suitable for testing. Thesendmethod correctly emits a new message to the subscription.The
subscribemethod creates a new subscription each time, which could lead to inconsistencies. However, this is acknowledged with a TODO comment and a link to a GitHub issue, indicating that it will be addressed in the future.Tools
SwiftLint
[Error] 93-93: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 99-99: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 118-118: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 124-124: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 115-115: Use shorthand syntax for optional binding
(shorthand_optional_binding)
134-179: LGTM!The
MockRoomReactionsactor provides a suitable mock implementation of theRoomReactionsprotocol. ThecreateSubscriptionmethod generates random reactions at a random interval, which is suitable for testing. Thesendmethod correctly emits a new reaction to the subscription.Tools
SwiftLint
[Error] 149-149: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 154-154: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 162-162: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 167-167: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 159-159: Use shorthand syntax for optional binding
(shorthand_optional_binding)
[Error] 163-163: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
[Error] 164-164: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
[Error] 165-165: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
[Error] 166-166: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
[Error] 167-167: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
181-229: LGTM!The
MockTypingactor provides a suitable mock implementation of theTypingprotocol. ThecreateSubscriptionmethod generates random typing events at a fixed interval, which is suitable for testing. Thestartandstopmethods correctly emit typing events to the subscription.Tools
SwiftLint
[Error] 213-213: Use shorthand syntax for optional binding
(shorthand_optional_binding)
[Error] 220-220: Use shorthand syntax for optional binding
(shorthand_optional_binding)
[Error] 198-198: Multi-line collection literals should have trailing commas
(trailing_comma)
231-336: LGTM!The
MockPresenceactor provides a suitable mock implementation of thePresenceprotocol. ThecreateSubscriptionmethod generates random presence events at a fixed interval, which is suitable for testing. Theenterandleavemethods correctly emit presence events to the subscription. The unimplemented methods are handled with fatal errors, which is acceptable for a mock.Tools
SwiftLint
[Error] 244-244: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 247-247: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 253-253: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 257-257: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 263-263: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 267-267: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 279-279: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 282-282: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 289-289: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 292-292: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 307-307: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 310-310: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 317-317: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 320-320: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 276-276: Use shorthand syntax for optional binding
(shorthand_optional_binding)
[Error] 286-286: Use shorthand syntax for optional binding
(shorthand_optional_binding)
[Error] 304-304: Use shorthand syntax for optional binding
(shorthand_optional_binding)
[Error] 314-314: Use shorthand syntax for optional binding
(shorthand_optional_binding)
338-370: LGTM!The
MockOccupancyactor provides a suitable mock implementation of theOccupancyprotocol. ThecreateSubscriptionmethod generates random occupancy events at a fixed interval, which is suitable for testing. The unimplementedsubscribeToDiscontinuitiesmethod is handled with a fatal error, which is acceptable for a mock.
372-397: LGTM!The
MockRoomStatusactor provides a suitable mock implementation of theRoomStatusprotocol. ThecreateSubscriptionmethod generates random room status changes at a fixed interval, which is suitable for testing. TheonChangemethod correctly returns a subscription to the mock subscription.
|
@maratal please can you:
|
maratal
force-pushed
the
4-api-mocks
branch
from
20e7869
to
a8f96d2
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 18
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (11)
Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/MockSubscription.swift (2)
6-12: LGTM: Well-structured type aliases and properties.The type aliases are well-defined and improve code readability. The use of
AsyncTimerSequenceandAsyncMerge2Sequencedemonstrates a sophisticated approach to handling asynchronous events. The private properties appropriately encapsulate the internal state of the subscription.Consider adding a brief documentation comment for the
MockSubscriptionstructure to explain its purpose and usage. This would enhance the code's self-documentation and make it easier for other developers to understand and use the structure.Tools
SwiftLint
[Error] 10-10: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
10-21: Remove trailing whitespace for improved code cleanliness.SwiftLint has reported trailing whitespace on lines 10, 13, 17, and 21. While this doesn't affect functionality, removing the trailing whitespace would improve code cleanliness and adhere to common style guidelines.
Please remove the trailing whitespace from the mentioned lines. You can use your IDE's functionality to automatically trim trailing whitespace or manually remove it.
Tools
SwiftLint
[Error] 10-10: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 13-13: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 17-17: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 21-21: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
Sources/AblyChat/Messages.swift (1)
3-3: LGTM! Consider adding a brief comment.The introduction of the
RealtimeChanneltype alias is a good addition. It enhances type safety and allows for more flexible use of channel types.Consider adding a brief comment explaining the purpose of this type alias for better code documentation:
+/// A type that represents a real-time channel conforming to both ARTRealtimeChannelProtocol and Sendable. public typealias RealtimeChannel = any(ARTRealtimeChannelProtocol & Sendable)Example/AblyChatExample/ContentView.swift (1)
291-297: LGTM! Consider adding a clarifying commentThe
flip()extension on View is well-implemented and serves its purpose effectively.To improve code clarity, consider adding a comment explaining the purpose of this extension:
extension View { /// Flips the view vertically and horizontally. /// This is used to reverse the order of views in a List, /// allowing new items to appear at the bottom instead of the top. func flip() -> some View { return self .rotationEffect(.radians(.pi)) .scaleEffect(x: -1, y: 1, anchor: .center) } }This comment will help other developers understand the purpose and usage of this extension at a glance.
Tools
SwiftLint
[Error] 293-293: Prefer implicit returns in closures, functions and getters
(implicit_return)
Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/MockClients.swift (7)
37-39: Implement therelease(roomID:)method to manage room resources.The
release(roomID:)method currently containsfatalError("Not yet implemented"), indicating that it's pending implementation. Properly releasing rooms is important for resource management and preventing potential memory leaks.Would you like assistance in implementing this method or should I open a GitHub issue to track this task?
271-273: Implement theisUserPresent(clientID:)method to check user presence.The
isUserPresent(clientID:)method currently throws afatalError, which prevents checking if a user is present in the room. Implementing this method will allow proper handling of presence queries.Would you like assistance in implementing this method or should I open a GitHub issue to track this task?
16-17: Implement theconnectionproperty to provide connection information.The
connectionproperty currently containsfatalError("Not yet implemented"). Implementing this property will provide necessary connection details for theMockChatClient.Do you need help implementing this property, or should I open a GitHub issue to track this task?
20-21: Implement theclientIDproperty to identify the client.The
clientIDproperty currently containsfatalError("Not yet implemented"). Implementing this property is essential for identifying the client within the mock chat system.Would you like assistance in implementing this property or should I open a GitHub issue to track this task?
69-71: Implement theattach()method to manage room attachment.The
attach()method is not yet implemented. This method is important for simulating the behavior of attaching to a room.Do you need help implementing this method, or should I open a GitHub issue to track this task?
73-75: Implement thedetach()method to manage room detachment.The
detach()method currently containsfatalError("Not yet implemented"). Implementing this method will allow proper detachment from rooms in the mock system.Would you like assistance in implementing this method or should I open a GitHub issue to track this task?
278-279: Implement theupdate()method to handle presence updates.The
update()method currently throws afatalError, indicating it's not implemented. Implementing this method will allow the mock presence to handle updates appropriately.Would you like assistance in implementing this method or should I open a GitHub issue to track this task?
Tools
SwiftLint
[Error] 279-279: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (12)
- Example/AblyChatExample.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj (8 hunks)
- Example/AblyChatExample/ContentView.swift (1 hunks)
- Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/Misc.swift (1 hunks)
- Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/MockClients.swift (1 hunks)
- Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/MockSubscription.swift (1 hunks)
- Sources/AblyChat/AblyCocoaExtensions/Ably+Dependencies.swift (1 hunks)
- Sources/AblyChat/EmitsDiscontinuities.swift (1 hunks)
- Sources/AblyChat/Messages.swift (1 hunks)
- Sources/AblyChat/Occupancy.swift (1 hunks)
- Sources/AblyChat/Presence.swift (1 hunks)
- Sources/AblyChat/RoomReactions.swift (1 hunks)
- Sources/AblyChat/Typing.swift (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (7)
- Example/AblyChatExample.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj
- Sources/AblyChat/AblyCocoaExtensions/Ably+Dependencies.swift
- Sources/AblyChat/EmitsDiscontinuities.swift
- Sources/AblyChat/Occupancy.swift
- Sources/AblyChat/Presence.swift
- Sources/AblyChat/RoomReactions.swift
- Sources/AblyChat/Typing.swift
Additional context used
Learnings (1)
Example/AblyChatExample/ContentView.swift (1)
Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#54 File: Sources/AblyChat/RoomLifecycleManager.swift:265-266 Timestamp: 2024-09-18T18:29:10.329Z Learning: In `RoomLifecycleManager.swift`, the use of `try!` with `await` for `clock.sleep` is intentional due to reasons outlined in the associated GitHub issue. Do not suggest changing this usage unless the issue is resolved.
SwiftLint
Example/AblyChatExample/ContentView.swift
[Error] 192-192: Conditional statements should always return on the next line
(conditional_returns_on_newline)
[Error] 29-29: Force tries should be avoided
(force_try)
[Error] 293-293: Prefer implicit returns in closures, functions and getters
(implicit_return)
[Error] 71-71: Trailing closure syntax should not be used when passing more than one closure argument
(multiple_closures_with_trailing_closure)
[Error] 193-193: Prefer
_ = foo()overlet _ = foo()when discarding a result from a function(redundant_discardable_let)
[Error] 19-19: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 31-31: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 35-35: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 120-120: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 124-124: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 132-132: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 140-140: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 148-148: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 162-162: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 170-170: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 190-190: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 196-196: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 203-203: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 215-215: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 219-219: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 222-222: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 271-271: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 304-304: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 6-6: Don't include vertical whitespace (empty line) after opening braces
(vertical_whitespace_opening_braces)
[Error] 203-203: Don't include vertical whitespace (empty line) after opening braces
(vertical_whitespace_opening_braces)
[Error] 304-304: Don't include vertical whitespace (empty line) after opening braces
(vertical_whitespace_opening_braces)
Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/Misc.swift
[Error] 38-38: Types used for hosting only static members should be implemented as a caseless enum to avoid instantiation
(convenience_type)
[Error] 12-12: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 18-18: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 18-18: Multi-line collection literals should have trailing commas
(trailing_comma)
[Error] 6-6: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 9-9: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 21-21: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 39-39: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 41-41: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 50-50: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 63-63: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 83-83: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 13-13: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
[Error] 14-14: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
[Error] 15-15: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
[Error] 16-16: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
[Error] 17-17: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
[Error] 18-18: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
[Error] 39-39: Don't include vertical whitespace (empty line) after opening braces
(vertical_whitespace_opening_braces)
[Error] 83-83: Don't include vertical whitespace (empty line) after opening braces
(vertical_whitespace_opening_braces)
Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/MockClients.swift
[Error] 93-93: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 99-99: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 118-118: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 124-124: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 149-149: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 154-154: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 162-162: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 167-167: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 244-244: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 247-247: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 253-253: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 257-257: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 263-263: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 267-267: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 279-279: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 282-282: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 289-289: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 292-292: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 307-307: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 310-310: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 317-317: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 320-320: Multiline arguments should have their surrounding brackets in a new line
(multiline_arguments_brackets)
[Error] 115-115: Use shorthand syntax for optional binding
(shorthand_optional_binding)
[Error] 159-159: Use shorthand syntax for optional binding
(shorthand_optional_binding)
[Error] 213-213: Use shorthand syntax for optional binding
(shorthand_optional_binding)
[Error] 220-220: Use shorthand syntax for optional binding
(shorthand_optional_binding)
[Error] 276-276: Use shorthand syntax for optional binding
(shorthand_optional_binding)
[Error] 286-286: Use shorthand syntax for optional binding
(shorthand_optional_binding)
[Error] 304-304: Use shorthand syntax for optional binding
(shorthand_optional_binding)
[Error] 314-314: Use shorthand syntax for optional binding
(shorthand_optional_binding)
[Error] 198-198: Multi-line collection literals should have trailing commas
(trailing_comma)
[Error] 163-163: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
[Error] 164-164: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
[Error] 165-165: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
[Error] 166-166: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
[Error] 167-167: Function parameters should be aligned vertically if they're in multiple lines in a method call
(vertical_parameter_alignment_on_call)
Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/MockSubscription.swift
[Error] 10-10: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 13-13: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 17-17: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 21-21: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
Additional comments not posted (8)
Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/MockSubscription.swift (3)
1-5: LGTM: Imports and structure declaration are well-defined.The import statements are appropriate for the functionality implemented. The
MockSubscriptionstructure is correctly declared as generic with aSendableconstraint, ensuring thread safety. The conformance toSendableandAsyncSequenceprotocols is appropriate for the intended use case.
14-20: LGTM: Concise and effective implementation ofemitandmakeAsyncIteratormethods.The
emitmethod provides a clean way to manually inject elements into the stream. ThemakeAsyncIteratormethod correctly implements theAsyncSequenceprotocol requirement by returning an iterator for the merged sequence. Both methods are well-implemented and serve their intended purposes effectively.Tools
SwiftLint
[Error] 17-17: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
1-30: Overall: Well-implemented mock subscription with minor suggestions for improvement.The
MockSubscriptionstructure is well-designed and effectively serves its purpose as a mock for testing and early feedback. The use of modern Swift features likeAsyncSequenceandAsyncAlgorithmsis commendable and results in a clean, efficient implementation.Key strengths:
- Proper use of generics and protocol conformance.
- Effective combination of
AsyncStreamand timer for simulating events.- Clear and concise method implementations.
Suggestions for improvement:
- Add documentation comments to enhance self-documentation.
- Consider making the
AsyncStreambuffering policy configurable.- Remove trailing whitespace for improved code cleanliness.
These minor improvements will further enhance the quality and usability of this well-structured mock implementation.
Tools
SwiftLint
[Error] 10-10: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 13-13: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 17-17: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 21-21: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/Misc.swift (1)
82-87: LGTM: Well-implemented extension for displaying reaction emojis.The
displayedTextcomputed property in theReactionextension is well-implemented. It provides a convenient way to display reactions as emojis while safely handling unknown reaction types.The use of optional chaining (
ReactionType(rawValue: type)?.emoji) and the nil-coalescing operator (?? ReactionType.idk.emoji) ensures that the code gracefully handles cases where the reaction type might not match any of the definedReactionTypecases.Tools
SwiftLint
[Error] 83-83: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 83-83: Don't include vertical whitespace (empty line) after opening braces
(vertical_whitespace_opening_braces)
Sources/AblyChat/Messages.swift (3)
Line range hint
1-100: Overall, the changes look good and improve the codebase.The modifications to the
Messagesprotocol and the introduction of theRealtimeChanneltype alias enhance the flexibility and modernity of the code. The shift to asynchronous methods aligns well with Swift's concurrency model.To ensure a smooth integration of these changes:
- Add documentation for the new type alias.
- Verify that all implementations of the
Messagesprotocol have been updated to match the new asynchronoussubscribemethod.- Check for any remaining uses of
ARTRealtimeChannelProtocolthat should be updated toRealtimeChannel.These changes set a good foundation for the mock implementation of the public API, as outlined in the PR objectives.
9-9: LGTM! Ensure consistency across the codebase.The update of the
channelproperty type to use the newRealtimeChanneltype alias is consistent with the earlier change and improves code flexibility.To ensure this change is consistently applied throughout the codebase, run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for any remaining uses of ARTRealtimeChannelProtocol that should be updated to RealtimeChannel # Test: Search for uses of ARTRealtimeChannelProtocol rg --type swift 'ARTRealtimeChannelProtocol' -g '!Messages.swift'If the script returns any results, consider whether those occurrences should also be updated to use
RealtimeChannel.
6-6: LGTM! Verify impact on existing implementations.The change to make
subscribean asynchronous method is a good improvement, aligning with modern Swift concurrency patterns.Please ensure that all implementations of the
Messagesprotocol have been updated to match this new asynchronous signature. Run the following script to check for any remaining synchronous implementations:If the script returns any results, those implementations need to be updated to match the new asynchronous signature.
Example/AblyChatExample/ContentView.swift (1)
1-317: Overall, great implementation with room for minor improvementsThe
ContentView.swiftfile successfully implements a chat interface using SwiftUI and a mock chat client, aligning well with the PR objectives. The code is generally well-structured and follows SwiftUI best practices. Here's a summary of the main points from the review:
- The use of
@MainActorand platform-specific screen dimension setup is appropriate.- Consider improving error handling in functions like
room(),setDefaultTitle(), andsendMessage().- The UI structure in the
bodyproperty is well-organized and includes all necessary elements for a chat interface.- The implementation of async functions for real-time updates is well done.
- The reaction animation system is creative and adds a nice touch to the user experience.
- Consider moving some components (like reactions) into separate files for better code organization.
- Add accessibility labels to improve the app's accessibility.
- Prepare for potential future localization by using
NSLocalizedString.These improvements will enhance the robustness, maintainability, and accessibility of the code while maintaining its current functionality.
Tools
SwiftLint
[Error] 192-192: Conditional statements should always return on the next line
(conditional_returns_on_newline)
[Error] 29-29: Force tries should be avoided
(force_try)
[Error] 293-293: Prefer implicit returns in closures, functions and getters
(implicit_return)
[Error] 71-71: Trailing closure syntax should not be used when passing more than one closure argument
(multiple_closures_with_trailing_closure)
[Error] 193-193: Prefer
_ = foo()overlet _ = foo()when discarding a result from a function(redundant_discardable_let)
[Error] 19-19: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 31-31: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 35-35: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 120-120: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 124-124: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 132-132: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 140-140: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 148-148: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 162-162: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 170-170: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 190-190: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 196-196: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 203-203: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 215-215: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 219-219: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 222-222: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 271-271: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 304-304: Lines should not have trailing whitespace
(trailing_whitespace)
[Error] 6-6: Don't include vertical whitespace (empty line) after opening braces
(vertical_whitespace_opening_braces)
[Error] 203-203: Don't include vertical whitespace (empty line) after opening braces
(vertical_whitespace_opening_braces)
[Error] 304-304: Don't include vertical whitespace (empty line) after opening braces
(vertical_whitespace_opening_braces)
|
A couple of commit messages could be improved, to make more sense if we need to revisit these commits in the future:
|
|
Also please can you make that, where it would be useful for future readers, the commit messages refer to the issues that they relate to or resolve? |
maratal
force-pushed
the
4-api-mocks
branch
from
769ec24
to
24cd34b
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
Example/AblyChatExample/ContentView.swift (1)
265-329: LGTM! Consider enhancing error handling in tryTask.The custom views and extensions are well-implemented and provide useful functionality. The flip() extension is a clever solution for reversing the list order.
For the tryTask extension, consider enhancing the error handling:
extension View { nonisolated func tryTask(priority: TaskPriority = .userInitiated, _ action: @escaping @Sendable () async throws -> Void) -> some View { task(priority: priority) { do { try await action() } catch { print("Action can't be performed: \(error)") // Consider using a proper logging system // Also, consider a way to show errors to the user, perhaps using an @State property } } } }This change would allow for more robust error handling and potentially better user feedback.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
- Example/AblyChatExample.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj (5 hunks)
- Example/AblyChatExample/ContentView.swift (1 hunks)
- Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/Misc.swift (1 hunks)
- Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/MockClients.swift (1 hunks)
- Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/MockSubscription.swift (1 hunks)
- Sources/AblyChat/EmitsDiscontinuities.swift (1 hunks)
- Sources/AblyChat/Messages.swift (1 hunks)
- Sources/AblyChat/Occupancy.swift (1 hunks)
- Sources/AblyChat/Presence.swift (1 hunks)
- Sources/AblyChat/RoomReactions.swift (1 hunks)
- Sources/AblyChat/Typing.swift (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (10)
- Example/AblyChatExample.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj
- Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/Misc.swift
- Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/MockClients.swift
- Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/MockSubscription.swift
- Sources/AblyChat/EmitsDiscontinuities.swift
- Sources/AblyChat/Messages.swift
- Sources/AblyChat/Occupancy.swift
- Sources/AblyChat/Presence.swift
- Sources/AblyChat/RoomReactions.swift
- Sources/AblyChat/Typing.swift
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
Example/AblyChatExample/ContentView.swift (2)
Learnt from: maratal PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#34 File: Example/AblyChatExample/ContentView.swift:201-259 Timestamp: 2024-09-22T21:35:19.573Z Learning: When reviewing, avoid making suggestions for `ContentView.swift`.Learnt from: maratal PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#34 File: Example/AblyChatExample/ContentView.swift:35-118 Timestamp: 2024-09-22T21:32:01.793Z Learning: Skip code review suggestions for `ContentView.swift` in the `Example/AblyChatExample` project.
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Example/AblyChatExample/ContentView.swift (2)
1-12: LGTM! Good setup for cross-platform compatibility.The imports, @mainactor usage, and screen dimension setup are well-implemented. The conditional compilation for different platforms ensures proper functionality across macOS, iOS, and tvOS.
35-108: LGTM! Well-structured and comprehensive chat interface.The main view body is well-implemented, covering all aspects of a chat interface including messages, reactions, typing indicators, and status updates. The use of ZStack for layering reactions is a clever solution, and the task modifiers ensure proper handling of asynchronous operations.
done
|
…on error: "Actor-isolated instance method cannot be used to satisfy nonisolated protocol requirement."
… require this: "Actor-isolated property 'channel' cannot be used to satisfy nonisolated protocol requirement".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (13)
Example/AblyChatExample/ContentView.swift (5)
27-108: LGTM! Well-structured UI and good use of SwiftUI features.The implementation of the
ContentViewbody and helper functions is well done. The use of computed properties likesendTitleand the structure of the UI in thebodyproperty are appropriate. The use of task modifiers for async operations is a good practice.Consider extracting some of the larger UI components (like the message list or input field) into separate view structs to improve readability and maintainability.
205-263: LGTM! Creative implementation of reactions.The implementation of the
Reactionstruct and related functions for handling reaction animations is well done. The use of random values for animation parameters adds a nice variety to the visual effects.To improve code organization and maintainability, consider moving the reaction-related code into a separate file, e.g.,
ReactionView.swift. This file could contain:
- The
Reactionstruct- A
ReactionViewstruct conforming toView- The helper functions
showReaction(),moveReactionUp(), andstartRotation()This separation of concerns would make the
ContentViewmore focused on its main responsibilities and make it easier to reuse or modify the reaction functionality in the future.
265-291: LGTM! Consider adding accessibility labels.The
BasicListItemstruct andMessageBasicVieware well-implemented and serve their purpose effectively. The use of conditional compilation for tvOS is a good practice.To improve accessibility, consider adding accessibility labels to the
MessageBasicView:struct MessageBasicView: View { var item: BasicListItem var body: some View { HStack { VStack { Text("\(item.title):") .foregroundColor(.blue) .bold() Spacer() } VStack { Text(item.text) Spacer() } } .accessibilityElement(children: .combine) .accessibilityLabel("Message from \(item.title): \(item.text)") #if !os(tvOS) .listRowSeparator(.hidden) #endif } }This change will make the chat more accessible to users with screen readers.
293-329: LGTM! Consider enhancing tryTask for custom error handling.The
flip()extension on View is a clever solution for reversing the order of list items. ThetryTask()extension provides a convenient way to handle errors in tasks.To make the
tryTask()function more flexible, consider allowing custom error handling:extension View { nonisolated func tryTask(priority: TaskPriority = .userInitiated, errorHandler: @escaping (Error) -> Void = { error in print("Action can't be performed: \(error)") }, _ action: @escaping @Sendable () async throws -> Void) -> some View { task(priority: priority) { do { try await action() } catch { errorHandler(error) } } } }This change allows users of
tryTask()to provide custom error handling when needed, while still maintaining the default behavior.
304-317: LGTM! Consider preparing for localization.The
PresenceEventTypeextension is well-implemented, providing human-readable descriptions for different presence events.To prepare for potential future localization, consider using string literals that can be easily extracted for translation:
extension PresenceEventType { var displayedText: String { switch self { case .enter: return NSLocalizedString("has entered the room", comment: "Presence event: user entered") case .leave: return NSLocalizedString("has left the room", comment: "Presence event: user left") case .present: return NSLocalizedString("has presented at the room", comment: "Presence event: user presented") case .update: return NSLocalizedString("has updated presence", comment: "Presence event: user updated") } } }This change will make it easier to localize the app in the future if needed, without changing the current functionality.
Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/MockClients.swift (8)
4-22: Implementation of MockChatClient looks good, but has unimplemented properties.The MockChatClient actor provides a basic structure for a mock chat client. However, the
connectionandclientIDproperties are not yet implemented.Consider adding TODO comments to the unimplemented properties to make it clear that they need to be addressed in the future:
nonisolated var connection: any Connection { + // TODO: Implement connection property fatalError("Not yet implemented") } nonisolated var clientID: String { + // TODO: Implement clientID property fatalError("Not yet implemented") }
24-44: MockRooms implementation looks good, with one unimplemented method.The MockRooms actor provides a functional implementation for managing mock rooms. The
getmethod correctly retrieves existing rooms or creates new ones as needed.Consider adding a TODO comment to the unimplemented
releasemethod:func release(roomID _: String) async throws { + // TODO: Implement room release functionality fatalError("Not yet implemented") }
46-76: MockRoom implementation provides a good structure with lazy initialization.The MockRoom actor effectively uses lazy initialization for various room components, which is a good practice for on-demand resource allocation.
Consider adding TODO comments to the unimplemented
attachanddetachmethods:func attach() async throws { + // TODO: Implement room attachment functionality fatalError("Not yet implemented") } func detach() async throws { + // TODO: Implement room detachment functionality fatalError("Not yet implemented") }
78-136: MockMessages implementation looks good, with room for minor improvements.The MockMessages actor provides a functional mock implementation for message handling, including subscription and sending capabilities.
- Consider adding a TODO comment to the unimplemented
subscribeToDiscontinuitiesmethod:func subscribeToDiscontinuities() -> Subscription<ARTErrorInfo> { + // TODO: Implement subscription to discontinuities fatalError("Not yet implemented") }
- In the
createSubscriptionmethod, consider using optional chaining or providing a default value instead of force unwrapping:-clientID: MockStrings.names.randomElement()!, +clientID: MockStrings.names.randomElement() ?? "DefaultUser",This change would make the code more robust against potential crashes if the
namesarray is empty.
138-187: MockRoomReactions implementation is functional, with minor improvement opportunities.The MockRoomReactions actor provides a good mock implementation for handling room reactions.
- Consider adding a TODO comment to the unimplemented
subscribeToDiscontinuitiesmethod:func subscribeToDiscontinuities() -> Subscription<ARTErrorInfo> { + // TODO: Implement subscription to discontinuities fatalError("Not yet implemented") }
- In the
createSubscriptionmethod, consider using optional chaining or providing a default value instead of force unwrapping:-type: ReactionType.allCases.randomElement()!.rawValue, +type: ReactionType.allCases.randomElement()?.rawValue ?? ReactionType.allCases[0].rawValue,This change would make the code more robust against potential crashes if
allCasesis empty (which is unlikely but possible).
189-236: MockTyping implementation is well-structured, with minor improvement opportunities.The MockTyping actor provides a good mock implementation for handling typing events.
- Consider adding a TODO comment to the unimplemented
subscribeToDiscontinuitiesmethod:func subscribeToDiscontinuities() -> Subscription<ARTErrorInfo> { + // TODO: Implement subscription to discontinuities fatalError("Not yet implemented") }
- In the
createSubscriptionmethod, consider using optional chaining or providing a default value instead of force unwrapping:-MockStrings.names.randomElement()!, +MockStrings.names.randomElement() ?? "DefaultUser",This change would make the code more robust against potential crashes if the
namesarray is empty.
238-361: MockPresence implementation is partially complete, with several unimplemented methods.The MockPresence actor provides a basic structure for mocking presence functionality, but several methods are not yet implemented.
Consider adding TODO comments to all unimplemented methods:
func isUserPresent(clientID _: String) async throws -> Bool { + // TODO: Implement user presence check fatalError("Not yet implemented") } func update() async throws { + // TODO: Implement presence update fatalError("Not yet implemented") } func update(data _: PresenceData) async throws { + // TODO: Implement presence update with data fatalError("Not yet implemented") } func subscribeToDiscontinuities() -> Subscription<ARTErrorInfo> { + // TODO: Implement subscription to discontinuities fatalError("Not yet implemented") }These comments will help track which functionalities need to be implemented in the future.
363-396: MockOccupancy implementation looks good, with one unimplemented method.The MockOccupancy actor provides a functional mock implementation for handling occupancy events and data.
Consider adding a TODO comment to the unimplemented
subscribeToDiscontinuitiesmethod:func subscribeToDiscontinuities() -> Subscription<ARTErrorInfo> { + // TODO: Implement subscription to discontinuities fatalError("Not yet implemented") }This comment will help track that this functionality needs to be implemented in the future.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
- Example/AblyChatExample.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj (5 hunks)
- Example/AblyChatExample/ContentView.swift (1 hunks)
- Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/Misc.swift (1 hunks)
- Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/MockClients.swift (1 hunks)
- Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/MockSubscription.swift (1 hunks)
- Sources/AblyChat/EmitsDiscontinuities.swift (1 hunks)
- Sources/AblyChat/Messages.swift (1 hunks)
- Sources/AblyChat/Occupancy.swift (1 hunks)
- Sources/AblyChat/Presence.swift (1 hunks)
- Sources/AblyChat/RoomReactions.swift (1 hunks)
- Sources/AblyChat/Typing.swift (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (8)
- Example/AblyChatExample.xcodeproj/project.pbxproj
- Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/Misc.swift
- Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/MockSubscription.swift
- Sources/AblyChat/EmitsDiscontinuities.swift
- Sources/AblyChat/Occupancy.swift
- Sources/AblyChat/Presence.swift
- Sources/AblyChat/RoomReactions.swift
- Sources/AblyChat/Typing.swift
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (2)
Example/AblyChatExample/ContentView.swift (3)
Learnt from: maratal PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#34 File: Example/AblyChatExample/ContentView.swift:201-259 Timestamp: 2024-09-22T21:35:19.573Z Learning: When reviewing, avoid making suggestions for `ContentView.swift`.Learnt from: maratal PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#34 File: Example/AblyChatExample/ContentView.swift:35-118 Timestamp: 2024-09-22T21:32:01.793Z Learning: Skip code review suggestions for `ContentView.swift` in the `Example/AblyChatExample` project.Learnt from: maratal PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#34 File: Example/AblyChatExample/ContentView.swift:27-33 Timestamp: 2024-09-27T01:05:30.739Z Learning: In `ContentView.swift`, the `room()` method does not use force try; it uses `try await` and handles errors appropriately.Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/MockClients.swift (4)
Learnt from: maratal PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#34 File: Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/MockClients.swift:24-44 Timestamp: 2024-09-22T21:36:09.485Z Learning: In mock implementations, it's acceptable to leave the `release` method unimplemented during early development.Learnt from: maratal PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#34 File: Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/MockClients.swift:367-369 Timestamp: 2024-09-22T21:19:09.956Z Learning: In mock implementations, it's acceptable to leave `subscribeToDiscontinuities` unimplemented during early development.Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#35 File: Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/MockRealtime.swift:34-174 Timestamp: 2024-09-02T16:30:41.278Z Learning: When reviewing code, do not ask lawrence-forooghian about "not yet implemented" `fatalError` calls.Learnt from: lawrence-forooghian PR: ably-labs/ably-chat-swift#35 File: Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/MockRealtime.swift:16-32 Timestamp: 2024-09-02T16:30:26.840Z Learning: When reviewing code, do not ask lawrence-forooghian about "not yet implemented" `fatalError` calls.
🔇 Additional comments (5)
Sources/AblyChat/Messages.swift (2)
7-7: Good abstraction with RealtimeChannelProtocol!The change from
ARTRealtimeChannelProtocoltoRealtimeChannelProtocolis a positive step towards abstracting away direct dependencies on the Ably SDK. This aligns with the information from a previous review thatRealtimeChannelis a typealias forany(ARTRealtimeChannelProtocol & Sendable).To ensure this change is consistently applied across the codebase, please run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of RealtimeChannelProtocol # Test: Search for occurrences of ARTRealtimeChannelProtocol rg --type swift 'ARTRealtimeChannelProtocol' # Test: Search for occurrences of RealtimeChannelProtocol rg --type swift 'RealtimeChannelProtocol' # Note: Review the results to ensure all relevant occurrences have been updated
4-4: Excellent update to async method!The change to make
subscribean async method is a great improvement. It aligns with modern Swift concurrency practices and allows for non-blocking operations when subscribing to messages.To ensure this change is properly implemented across the codebase, please run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
Please run the following scripts to further verify the usage of the updated
subscribemethod:
Please run the following script to verify that all
subscribemethod calls are properly prefixed withawait, accounting for method chaining:
All
subscribemethod calls are correctly usingawait.The update to make
subscribean async method has been successfully implemented across the codebase. All instances ofsubscribeare properly prefixed withawait, ensuring adherence to Swift's concurrency practices.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the usage of the updated subscribe method # Test: Search for calls to the subscribe method rg --type swift 'subscribe\s*\(\s*bufferingPolicy:' # Note: Review the results to ensure all calls to subscribe are updated to use 'await'Length of output: 1772
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all calls to the subscribe method rg --type swift 'subscribe\s*\('Length of output: 4733
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all calls to the subscribe method without 'await' rg --type swift 'await\s+subscribe\s*\('Length of output: 42
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Find all calls to the subscribe method without 'await', accounting for method chaining rg --type swift 'await\s+[\w\.\(\)]+\s*\.?\s*subscribe\s*\('Length of output: 745
Example/AblyChatExample/ContentView.swift (1)
4-26: LGTM! Good use of @mainactor and platform-specific setup.The initial setup of the
ContentViewstruct is well-implemented. The use of@MainActoris appropriate for UI-related code, and the platform-specific screen dimension setup is a good practice. The state variables are well-defined for managing the chat state, including messages, reactions, and UI elements.Example/AblyChatExample/Mocks/MockClients.swift (2)
1-3: LGTM: Imports look good.The necessary imports for Ably and AblyChat are present.
398-424: MockRoomStatus implementation is complete and well-structured.The MockRoomStatus actor provides a fully functional mock implementation for handling room status changes. All required methods are implemented, and the use of mock subscriptions for simulating status changes is appropriate.
Closes #4
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
AsyncAlgorithmsfor additional utilities.Improvements
Bug Fixes