You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Comparing the file sizes of an original colored tile from OSM (http://tile.openstreetmap.org/3/2/4.png) @ 7.3 KB
and
The converted greyscale image, which is @ 14.4 KB (twice the size)
After looking at the properties of the two images, I found that the greyscale image has added Alpha Channel information, which results in the 7KB increase.
So... it could probably be optimized ^^
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Well, it's just twice, and I doubt that alpha channel is the sole cause for the size increase: new tiles differ from old, and compression algorithm may be different. If you have the time, pull request to fix this would be welcome :)
Comparing the file sizes of an original colored tile from OSM (http://tile.openstreetmap.org/3/2/4.png) @ 7.3 KB
and
The converted greyscale image, which is @ 14.4 KB (twice the size)
After looking at the properties of the two images, I found that the greyscale image has added Alpha Channel information, which results in the 7KB increase.
So... it could probably be optimized ^^
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: