Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Validate the interpreter's major version against the contract's/library's major version #1176

Open
jjcnn opened this issue Sep 28, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
backwards-incompatible-change bug Something isn't working evaluator Scilla evaluator
Milestone

Comments

@jjcnn
Copy link
Contributor

jjcnn commented Sep 28, 2022

It looks like we don't always check that the contract/library has a major version that matches the major version of the checker/interpreter. At least this is the case when a message is sent to a library (see #1175).

This is not a problem as long as there is only a single major version in play, but should be checked thoroughly once we reach v1.

@jjcnn jjcnn added bug Something isn't working evaluator Scilla evaluator backwards-incompatible-change labels Sep 28, 2022
@jjcnn jjcnn added this to the Scilla 1.0.0 milestone Sep 28, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backwards-incompatible-change bug Something isn't working evaluator Scilla evaluator
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant