Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Could you provide the fine-tuned weights? #72

Open
CatfishW opened this issue Jul 17, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Could you provide the fine-tuned weights? #72

CatfishW opened this issue Jul 17, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@CatfishW
Copy link

I finetuned your base-class weight on MS COCO dataset using RTX4070ti after 100 epochs with the batch size of 1 while other hyperparamter settings remain the same in accordance with the scripts you provided, but it does not reproduce to the accuracy to your essay out of the blue. The evaluation results for 10 shots are as follows:

Averaged stats: class_error: 76.92 loss: 25.7722 (22.3666) loss_ce: 2.4055 (1.9647) loss_bbox: 0.9593 (0.8582) loss_giou: 1.2056 (1.0262) loss_ce_0: 2.3303 (1.9005) loss_bbox_0: 0.8101 (0.7742) loss_giou_0: 1.0498 (1.0038) loss_ce_1: 2.3550 (1.8903) loss_bbox_1: 0.8683 (0.8341) loss_giou_1: 1.0159 (0.9948) loss_ce_2: 2.4136 (1.9047) loss_bbox_2: 0.8322 (0.8132) loss_giou_2: 1.0873 (0.9953) loss_ce_3: 2.2909 (1.8730) loss_bbox_3: 0.8844 (0.8044) loss_giou_3: 1.0809 (1.0009) loss_ce_4: 2.1820 (1.9072) loss_bbox_4: 0.8562 (0.8144) loss_giou_4: 1.0902 (1.0071) loss_ce_unscaled: 1.2028 (0.9824) class_error_unscaled: 50.0000 (43.5332) loss_bbox_unscaled: 0.1919 (0.1716) loss_giou_unscaled: 0.6028 (0.5131) cardinality_error_unscaled: 299.5000 (299.4213) loss_ce_0_unscaled: 1.1651 (0.9503) loss_bbox_0_unscaled: 0.1620 (0.1548) loss_giou_0_unscaled: 0.5249 (0.5019) cardinality_error_0_unscaled: 298.4375 (298.3096) loss_ce_1_unscaled: 1.1775 (0.9451) loss_bbox_1_unscaled: 0.1737 (0.1668) loss_giou_1_unscaled: 0.5080 (0.4974) cardinality_error_1_unscaled: 299.3750 (299.0845) loss_ce_2_unscaled: 1.2068 (0.9523) loss_bbox_2_unscaled: 0.1664 (0.1626) loss_giou_2_unscaled: 0.5437 (0.4976) cardinality_error_2_unscaled: 298.7500 (298.6726) loss_ce_3_unscaled: 1.1455 (0.9365) loss_bbox_3_unscaled: 0.1769 (0.1609) loss_giou_3_unscaled: 0.5405 (0.5004) cardinality_error_3_unscaled: 299.3125 (299.0845) loss_ce_4_unscaled: 1.0910 (0.9536) loss_bbox_4_unscaled: 0.1712 (0.1629) loss_giou_4_unscaled: 0.5451 (0.5035) cardinality_error_4_unscaled: 299.4375 (299.2578)

  • Novel Categories:
    Accumulating evaluation results...
    DONE (t=1.25s).
    IoU metric: bbox
    Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= all | maxDets=100 ] = 0.075
    Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.50 | area= all | maxDets=100 ] = 0.163
    Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.75 | area= all | maxDets=100 ] = 0.061
    Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= small | maxDets=100 ] = 0.015
    Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=medium | maxDets=100 ] = 0.061
    Average Precision (AP) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= large | maxDets=100 ] = 0.127
    Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= all | maxDets= 1 ] = 0.141
    Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= all | maxDets= 10 ] = 0.213
    Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= all | maxDets=100 ] = 0.222
    Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= small | maxDets=100 ] = 0.043
    Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area=medium | maxDets=100 ] = 0.160
    Average Recall (AR) @[ IoU=0.50:0.95 | area= large | maxDets=100 ] = 0.360

Thus, I'm wondering if you could provide your fine-tuned weights, and my email address is [email protected].

Looking forward to your reply.

@nanfangAlan
Copy link

Are you finetuned with 8 x GPUs?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants